Skip to main content

Extracting Adverse Drug Events from Text Using Human Advice

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9105))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 8528 Accesses

Abstract

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a major concern and point of emphasis for the medical profession, government, and society in general. When methods extract ADEs from observational data, there is a necessity to evaluate these methods. More precisely, it is important to know what is already known in the literature. Consequently, we employ a novel relation extraction technique based on a recently developed probabilistic logic learning algorithm that exploits human advice. We demonstrate on a standard adverse drug events data base that the proposed approach can successfully extract existing adverse drug events from limited amount of training data and compares favorably with state-of-the-art probabilistic logic learning methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blockeel, H.: Top-down induction of first order logical decision trees. AI Communications 12(1-2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cristianini, N.: Shawe-Taylor: An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finkel, J., Grenager, T., Manning, C.: Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2005, pp. 363–370. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, J.: Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. In: Annals of Statistics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gurwitz, J., Field, T., L, Harrold, R.J., Kebellis, K., Seger, A.: Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 289 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gutmann, B., Kersting, K.: TildeCRF: Conditional random fields for logical sequences. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang, N., Singh, B., Bui, C., Afzal, Z., van Mulligen, E.M., Kors, J.: Knowledge-based extraction of adverse drug events from biomedical text. BMC Bioinformatics 15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karwath, A., Kersting, K., Landwehr, N.: Boosting relational sequence alignments. In: ICDM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kersting, K., Driessens, K.: Non-parametric policy gradients: A unified treatment of propositional and relational domains. In: ICML (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein, D., Manning, C.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 423–430. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Natarajan, S., Bangera, V., Khot, T., Picado, J.: et al.: A novel text-based method for evaluation of adverse drug event discovery. Journal of Biomedical Informatics (2015) (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Natarajan, S., Joshi, S., Tadepalli, P., Kersting, K., Shavlik, J.: Imitation learning in relational domains: A functional-gradient boosting approach. In: IJCAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Natarajan, S., Khot, T., Kersting, K., Gutmann, B., Shavlik, J.: Gradient-based boosting for statistical relational learning: The relational dependency network case. Machine Learning 86(1) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Odom, P., Khot, T., Porter, R., Natarajan, S.: Knowledge-based probabilistic logic learning. In: AAAI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan, P., Welebob, E., Hartzema, A.G., Stang, P., Overhage, J.M.: Surveying us observational data sources and characteristics for drug safety needs. Pharmaceutical Medicine, 231–238 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schapire, R., Freund, Y.: Boosting: Foundations and Algorithms. MIT Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, S., Khot, T., Kersting, K., Kunapuli, G., Hauser, K., Natarajan, S.: Learning from imbalanced data in relational domains: A soft margin approach. In: ICDM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip Odom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Odom, P., Bangera, V., Khot, T., Page, D., Natarajan, S. (2015). Extracting Adverse Drug Events from Text Using Human Advice. In: Holmes, J., Bellazzi, R., Sacchi, L., Peek, N. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9105. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19550-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19551-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics