Skip to main content

Analyzing Recommendations Interactions in Clinical Guidelines

Impact of Action Type Hierarchies and Causation Beliefs

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9105))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Accounting for patients with multiple health conditions is a complex task that requires analysing potential interactions among recommendations meant to address each condition. Although some approaches have been proposed to address this issue, important features still require more investigation, such as (re)usability and scalability. To this end, this paper presents an approach that relies on reusable rules for detecting interactions among recommendations coming from various guidelines. It extends previously proposed models by introducing the notions of action type hierarchy and causation beliefs, and provides a systematic analysis of relevant interactions in the context of multimorbidity. Finally, the approach is assessed based on a case-study taken from the literature to highlight the added value of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shekelle, P., Woolf, S., Grimshaw, J.M., Schünemann, H.J., Eccles, M.P.: Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implementation Science: IS 7(1), 62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jafarpour, B.: Ontology Merging using Semantically-defined Merge Criteria and OWL Reasoning Services: Towards Execution-time Merging of Multiple Clinical Workflows to Handle Comorbidity. PhD thesis, Dalhousie University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. López-Vallverdú, J.A., Riaño, D., Collado, A.: Rule-based combination of comorbid treatments for chronic diseases applied to hypertension, diabetes mellitus and heart failure. In: Lenz, R., Miksch, S., Peleg, M., Reichert, M., Riaño, D., ten Teije, A. (eds.) ProHealth 2012 and KR4HC 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7738, pp. 30–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilk, S., Michalowski, M., Tan, X., Michalowski, W.: Using First-Order Logic to Represent Clinical Practice Guidelines and to Mitigate Adverse Interactions. In: Miksch, S., Riano, D., ten Teije, A. (eds.) KR4HC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8903, pp. 45–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piovesan, L., Molino, G., Terenziani, P.: An ontological knowledge and multiple abstraction level decision support system in healthcare. Decision Analytics 1(1), 8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zamborlini, V., da Silveira, M., Pruski, C., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F.: Towards a conceptual model for enhancing reasoning about clinical guidelines: A case-study on comorbidity. In: Miksch, S., Riano, D., ten Teije, A. (eds.) KR4HC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8903, pp. 29–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zamborlini, V., Hoekstra, R., da Silveira, M., Pruski, C., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F.: A Conceptual Model for Detecting Interactions among Medical Recommendations in Clinical Guidelines. In: Janowicz, K., Schlobach, S., Lambrix, P., Hyvönen, E. (eds.) EKAW 2014. LNCS, vol. 8876, pp. 591–606. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zamborlini, V., Hoekstra, R., da Silveira, M., Pruski, C., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F.: Inferring Recommendation Interactions in Clinical Guidelines: Case-studies on Multimorbidity. Semantic Web Journal (2015 - Invited submission as extension of [7], Under Revision, Open Acess, http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/inferring-recommendation-interactions-clinical-guidelines-case-studies-multimorbidity

  9. Chavez, M.L., Jordan, M.A., Chavez, P.I.: Evidence-based drug–herbal interactions. Life Sciences 78(18), 2146–2157 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piovesan, L., Anselma, L., Terenziani, P.: Temporal Detection of Guideline Interactions. In: Int. Conf. on Health Informatics (HEALTHINF), Lisbon (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veruska Zamborlini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zamborlini, V., da Silveira, M., Pruski, C., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F. (2015). Analyzing Recommendations Interactions in Clinical Guidelines. In: Holmes, J., Bellazzi, R., Sacchi, L., Peek, N. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9105. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19550-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19551-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics