Abstract
There are three forms of indeterminacy in legal documents (statutes, constitutions, regulations, contracts, briefs, forms and other): (1) ambiguity , (2) scope of reference , and (3) vagueness . The first two, ambiguity and scope of reference indeterminacies, can be avoided – and should be. The third, vagueness , is inevitable, but its scope can be managed. For example, “giving notice” can be required in 24 hours, 30 days, one year or in a timely fashion. The solution of the drafters, for example, of the Uniform Commercial Code (of the United States) was “seasonable notice”. So, sometimes deliberate vagueness is the course of wisdom and preferred choice.The First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 9-608 of the Uniform Commercial Code contain various ambiguities and indefiniteness in scope of reference that are analyzed here in detail along with our proposed resolutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hohfeld, Wesley E. 1917. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 26:710.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, L.E., Lysaght, L.J. (2015). Modern Logic as a Tool for Remedying Ambiguities in Legal Documents and Analyzing the Structure of Legal Documents’ Contained Definitions. In: Araszkiewicz, M., Płeszka, K. (eds) Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking. Legisprudence Library, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19574-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19575-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)