Abstract
We manipulated three types of short feedback (emotional, epistemic, and neutral) in an intelligent tutoring system designed to help struggling adult readers improve reading comprehension strategies. Although participants self-reported a preference for emotional feedback, there were no differences in individual motivation or usefulness ratings between emotional and epistemic feedback. Analysis from coded facial emotions indicated that participants tended to be more sensitive to epistemic feedback than emotional feedback.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Shute, V.J.: Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 78(1), 153–189 (2008)
Graesser, A.C., Baer, W., Feng, S., Walker, B., Clewley, D., Hayes, D.P.: Emotions in Adaptive Computer Technologies for Adults Improving Reading. In: Tettegah, S., Ferdig, R. (eds.) Emotions and Technology: Communication of Feeling For, With, and Through Digital Media, pp. 1–35. Elsevier, San Diego (2014)
Cai, Z., Feng, S., Baer, W., Graesser, A.C.: Instructional strategies in trialoguebased intelligent tutoring systems. In: Goldberg, B., Graesser, A.C., Hu, X., Sottilare, R. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, vol. 2, pp. 225–235. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Orlando (2014)
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., O’Donovan, B.: Feedback: All that Effort, but What is the Effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35(3), 277–289 (2010)
Person, N.K., Kreuz, R.J., Zwaan, R., Graesser, A.C.: Pragmatics and Pedagogy: Conversational Rules and Politeness Strategies May Inhibit Effective Tutoring. Cognition and Instruction 13, 161–188 (1995)
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J.L., Cox, K.E.: Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount. Scientific Studies of Reading 3, 231–256 (1999)
D’Mello, S.K.: A Selective Meta-analysis on the Relative Incidence of Discrete Affective States During Learning with Technology. Journal of Educational Psychology 105, 1082–1099 (2013)
Hoque, M.E., McDuff, D.J., Picard, R.W.: Exploring Temporal Patterns in Classifying Frustrated and Delighted Smiles. Affective Computer 3, 323–334 (2012)
D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.C.: AutoTutor and Affective AutoTutor: Learning by Talking with Cognitively and Emotionally Intelligent Computers that Talk Back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2(4), 1–38 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Feng, S., Stewart, J., Clewley, D., Graesser, A.C. (2015). Emotional, Epistemic, and Neutral Feedback in AutoTutor Trialogues to Improve Reading Comprehension. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_64
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_64
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)