Skip to main content

Adapting Feedback Types According to Students’ Affective States

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4802 Accesses

Abstract

Affective states play a significant role in students’ learning behaviour. Positive affective states can enhance learning, while negative ones can inhibit it. This paper describes the development of an affective state reasoner that is able to adapt the feedback type according to students’ affective states in order to evoke positive affective states and as such improve their learning experience. The reasoner relies on a dynamic Bayesian network trained with data gathered in a series of ecologically valid Wizard-of-Oz studies, where the effect of feedback on students’ affective states was investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker, R.S.J.D., DMello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(4), 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DMello, S.K., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.C.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning & Instruction 29(1), 153–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogt, T., André, E.: Comparing feature sets for acted and spontaneous speech in view of automatic emotion recognition. In: Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2005), pp. 474–477 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salmeron-Majadas, S., Santos, O., Boticario, J.: Exploring indicators from keyboard and mouse interactions to predict the user affective state. In: EDM 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conati, C., MacLaren, H.: Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shen, L., Wang, M., Shen, R.: Affective e-learning: Using emotional data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment. Educational Technology & Society 12(2), 176–189 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DMello, S., Craig, S., Gholson, B., Franklin, S., Picard, R., Graesser, A.: Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop at 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 7–13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Hansen, A., Loibl, K., Gutiérrez-Santos, S.: Affect Matters: Exploring the Impact of Feedback during Mathematical Tasks in an Exploratory Environment. In Proc. AIED 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Mavrikis, M., Magoulas, G.: A separation of concerns for engineering intelligent support for exploratory learning environments. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 44(3), 347–360 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pekrun, R.: The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. J. Edu. Psych. Rev. pp. 315–341 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., Pain, H.: Diagnosing and acting on student affect: the tutors perspective. UMUAI 18(1), 125–173 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R.S.J.D., Rodrigo, M.M.T.: Baker-Rodrigo Observation Method Protocol (BROMP) 1.0. Training Manual version 1.0. Tech. rep., New York, NY: EdLab. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate Grawemeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutierrez-Santos, S. (2015). Adapting Feedback Types According to Students’ Affective States. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics