Skip to main content

The Role of Peer Agent’s Learning Competency in Trialogue-Based Reading Intelligent Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates how the peer agent’s learning competency affects English learners’ reading, engagement, system self-efficacy, and attitudes toward the peer agent in a trialogue-based intelligent tutoring system (ITS). Participants learned a summarizing reading strategy in the compare-contrast text structure in the ITS. Results detected the significant main effect of the peer agent’s learning competency on learners’ performance and on engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hietala, P., Niemirepo, T.: The Competence of Learning Companion Agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 9, 178–192 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: PALS Groups: Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development 54, 223–243 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, H., Shubeck, K., Graesser, A.C.: Using technology in language assessment. In: Tsagari, D., Banerjee, J. (eds.) Contemporary Second Language Assessment (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vygotsky, L.S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falchikov, N.: What is peer tutoring? In: Falchikov, N. (ed.) Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, pp. 7–66. RoutledgeFalmer, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pintrich, P.R., De Groot, E.V.: Motivational and Self-regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 33–40 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R.: Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests. Riverside, Chicago (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiying Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, H., Cheng, Q., Yu, Q., Graesser, A.C. (2015). The Role of Peer Agent’s Learning Competency in Trialogue-Based Reading Intelligent Systems. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_94

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_94

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics