Skip to main content

Some Results on Interactive Proofs for Real Computations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolving Computability (CiE 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9136))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study interactive proofs in the framework of real number complexity theory as introduced by Blum, Shub, and Smale. Shamir’s famous result characterizes the class IP as PSPACE or, equivalently, as PAT and PAR in the Turing model. Since space resources alone are known not to make much sense in real number computations the question arises whether IP can be similarly characterized by one of the latter classes. Ivanov and de Rougemont [9] started this line of research showing that an analogue of Shamir’s result holds in the additive Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation when only Boolean messages can be exchanged. Here, we introduce interactive proofs in the full BSS model. As main result we prove an upper bound for the class \(\mathrm{IP}_{{\mathbb R}}\). It gives rise to the conjecture that a characterization of \(\mathrm{IP}_{{\mathbb R}}\) will not be given via one of the real complexity classes \(\mathrm{PAR}_{{\mathbb R}}\) or \(\mathrm{PAT}_{{\mathbb R}}\). We report on ongoing approaches to prove as well interesting lower bounds for \(\mathrm{IP}_{{\mathbb R}}\).

K. Meer—Both authors were supported under projects ME 1424/7-1 and ME 1424/7-2 by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG. We gratefully acknowledge the support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The simultaneous requirement of exponential time and polynomial space excludes the above mentioned coding trick from [11] and makes the definition meaningful.

  2. 2.

    This of course only makes sense after \(\mathrm{MA}\exists _{{\mathbb R}}\) has been defined precisely.

  3. 3.

    Though formally the classes in [9] are defined a bit differently it is easy to see that their protocols used to prove the theorem fit into \(\mathrm{IP}_{{\mathbb R}}\).

References

  1. Arora, S., Barak, B.: Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Baartse, M., Meer, K.: The PCP theorem for NP over the reals. Found. Comput. Math. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10208-014-9188-x

  3. Basu, S., Zell, T.: Polynomial hierarchy, Betti numbers, and a real analogue of Toda’s theorem. Found. Comput. Math. 10(4), 429–454 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, L., Cucker, F., Shub, M., Smale, S.: Complexity and Real Computation. Springer, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bürgisser, P., Cucker, F.: Counting complexity classes for numeric computations I: semilinear sets. SIAM J. Comput. 33(1), 227–260 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bürgisser, P., Cucker, F.: Counting complexity classes for numeric computations. II. algebraic and semialgebraic sets. J. Complex. 22(2), 147–191 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cucker, F.: On the complexity of quantifier elimination: the structural approach. Comput. J. 36(5), 400–408 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cucker, F., Briquel, I.: A note on parallel and alternating time. J. Complex. 23, 594–602 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivanov, S., de Rougemont, M.: Interactive protocols on the reals. Comput. Complex. 8, 330–345 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lund, C., Fortnow, L., Karloff, H., Nisan, N.: Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems. J. ACM 39(4), 859–868 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Michaux, C.: Une remarque à propos des machines sur \(\mathbb{R}\) introduites par Blum. Shub et Smale. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t. 309, Série I, pp. 435–437 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shamir, A.: IP = PSPACE. J. ACM 39(4), 869–877 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Meer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baartse, M., Meer, K. (2015). Some Results on Interactive Proofs for Real Computations. In: Beckmann, A., Mitrana, V., Soskova, M. (eds) Evolving Computability. CiE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9136. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20028-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20028-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20027-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20028-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics