Abstract
Social media debate sites provide a rich collection of public opinions on various controversial issues. In an online debate, participants express their stances by replying directly to the main topic or indirectly to other participants. We observe that the majority of the posts in online debates are interaction posts. In this paper, we propose a new method for the task of stance classification of interaction posts in online debates. We mine the historical activities and textual content of posts to learn the relationships between participants in online debates. Then we build the interaction graph and develop a greedy algorithm to classify participants by stance. Empirical evaluation shows that our method performs better than the baseline methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Sridhar, D., Getoor, L., Walker, M.: Collective stance classification of posts in online debate forums. In: ACL 2014, p. 109 (2014)
Qiu, M., Yang, L., Jiang, J.: Modeling interaction features for debate side clustering. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 873–878. ACM (2013)
Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R., Xu, Y.: Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 529–535. ACM (2003)
Murakami, A., Raymond, R.: Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 869–875. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Lu, Y., Wang, H., Zhai, C., Roth, D.: Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1642–1646. ACM (2012)
Yessenalina, A., Yue, Y., Cardie, C.: Multi-level structured models for document-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1046–1056. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Bansal, M., Cardie, C., Lee, L.: The power of negative thinking: exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. In: COLING (Posters), pp. 15–18 (2008)
Thomas, M., Pang, B., Lee, L.: Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 327–335. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)
Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1, vol. 1, pp. 226–234. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)
Anand, P., Walker, M., Abbott, R., Tree, J.E.F., Bowmani, R., Minor, M.: Cats rule and dogs drool!: classifying stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, pp. 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)
Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pp. 116–124. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Galley, M., McKeown, K., Hirschberg, J., Shriberg, E.: Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 669. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)
Abu-Jbara, A., Radev, D.: Subgroup detector: a system for detecting subgroups in online discussions. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)
Hassan, A., Abu-Jbara, A., Radev, D.: Detecting subgroups in online discussions by modeling positive and negative relations among participants. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 59–70. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system-a case study. Technical report (No. TR-00–043), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (2000)
Golub, G.H., Reinsch, C.: Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numer. Math. 14(5), 403–420 (1970)
Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2(3), 27 (2011)
Rendl, F., Rinaldi, G., Wiegele, A.: Solving max-cut to optimality by intersecting semidefinite and polyhedral relaxations. Math. Program. 121(2), 307–335 (2010)
Acknowledgement
This paper is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant Number 61472006), the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20130001110032) and the National Basic Research Program (973 Program No. 2014CB340405).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rong, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, M. (2015). Classifying Stances of Interaction Posts in Social Media Debate Sites. In: Huang, DS., Jo, KH., Hussain, A. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Methodologies. ICIC 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22186-1_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22186-1_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22185-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22186-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)