Abstract
Organisations are increasingly becoming interdependent in order to create and deliver superior value to their customers. The resulting business models of such organisations are becoming increasingly complex and difficult to design, because they have to deal with multiple stakeholders and their competing interests, and with dynamic and fast paced markets. Hence, in order to ensure the long-term survival of such firms, it is crucial that their business models are viable. Business model ontologies (BMOs) are effective tools for designing and evaluating business models. However, the viability perspective has largely been ignored, and the current BMOs have not been evaluated on their capabilities to facilitate the design and evaluation of viable business models. In order to address this gap, current BMOs have been assessed from the viability perspective. To evaluate the BMOs, a list of 26 criteria is derived from the literature. This list of criteria is then applied to assess six well-established BMOs. The analysis reveals that none of the BMOs satisfies all the criteria. However, the e3-value satisfies most of the criteria, and it is most appropriate for designing and evaluating viable business models. Furthermore, the identified deficits clearly define the areas for enhancing the BMOs from a viability perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
An enterprise architecture is defined as “a coherent whole of principles, methods, and models that are used in the design and realisation of an enterprise’s organisational structure, business processes, information systems, and infrastructure” [2].
References
Adhikari, R.S., Aste, N., Manfren, M.: Multi-commodity network flow models for dynamic energy management-smart grid applications. Energy Procedia 14, 1374–1379 (2012)
Lankshorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work-Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)
Kraussl-Derzsi, Z.: OPerationalized ALignment: Assessing Feasibility of Value Constellations Exploiting Innovative Services. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (2011)
Gordijn, J., Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Comparing two business model ontologies for designing e-business models and value constellations. In: Proceedings of the 18th Bled eConference, pp. 6–8, Bled (2005)
Lasa, I.S., Laburu, C.O., De Castro Vila, R.: An evaluation of the value stream mapping tool. Bus. Process Manag. J. 14, 39–52 (2008)
McCarthy, W.E.: The rea accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554–578 (1982)
Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006)
Engelsman, W., Wieringa, R.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering and enterprise architecture: two case studies and some lessons learned. In: Regnell, B., Damian, D. (eds.) REFSQ 2011. LNCS, vol. 7195, pp. 306–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. In: 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, pp. 17–19, Bled (2002)
Pateli, A.G., Giaglis, G.M.: A research framework for analysing eBusiness models. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 13, 302–314 (2004)
Al-Debei, M.M., Avison, D.: Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 359–376 (2010)
Lambert, S.: A Review of the Electronic Commerce Literature to Determine the Meaning of the Term ‘Business Model’. Flinders University of South Australia, School of Commerce (2003)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(1), 1–25 (2005)
Porter, M.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York (1985)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: Mayr, H.C., Liddle, S.W., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER Workshops 2000. LNCS, vol. 1921, p. 40. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Sharma, S., Gutiérrez, J.A.: An evaluation framework for viable business models for m-commerce in the information technology sector. Electron. Mark. 20, 33–52 (2010)
De Reuver, M., Haaker, T.: Designing viable business models for context-aware mobile services. Telemat. Inform. 26, 240–248 (2009)
Keen, P., Qureshi, S.: Organizational transformation through business models: a framework for business model design. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual HICSS 2006, vol. 8, p. 206b. IEEE (2006)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requir. Eng. 8, 114–134 (2003)
Mäkinen, S., Seppänen, M.: Assessing business model concepts with taxonomical research criteria: a preliminary study. Manag. Res. News 30, 735–748 (2007)
Lambert, S.: A conceptual model analysis framework: Analysing and comparing business model frameworks and ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, International Business Management Association (IBMA) (2010)
Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Tapscott, D., Lowy, A., Ticoll, D.: Digital capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business Press, Watertown (2000)
Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37, 1019–1042 (2011)
Lepak, D.P., Smith, K.G., Taylor, M.S.: Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 180–194 (2007)
Bowman, C., Ambrosini, V.: Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. Br. J. Manag. 11, 1–15 (2000)
Amit, R., Zott, C.: Value creation in e-business. Strateg. Manag. J. 22, 493–520 (2001)
Eriksson, H.E., Penker, M.: Business modeling with UML. Wiley, Chichester (2000)
Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford University Press, Cary (1997)
Weill, P., Vitale, M.: What it infrastructure capabilities are needed to implement e-business models. MIS Q. Exec. 1, 17–34 (2002)
Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32, 4–16 (1993)
Baden-Fuller, C., Haefliger, S.: Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Plan. 46, 419–426 (2013)
Allee, V.: A value network approach for modeling and measuring intangibles. In: Transparent Enterprise, Madrid (2002)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2010)
Rother, M., Shook, J.: Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda.-Version 1.3. Learning Enterprise Institute, Cambridge (2003)
Acknowledgements
This research has been financed by a grant of the Energy Delta Gas Research (EDGaR) programme. EDGaR is co-financed by the Northern Netherlands Provinces, the European Fund for Regional Development, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Province of Groningen, the Netherlands. NICTA is funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Communications and the Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
D’Souza, A., van Beest, N.R.T.P., Huitema, G.B., Wortmann, J.C., Velthuijsen, H. (2015). A Review and Evaluation of Business Model Ontologies: A Viability Perspective. In: Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Camp, O., Filipe, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 227. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22347-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22348-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)