Skip to main content

How Does Irony Affect Sentiment Analysis Tools?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9273))

Abstract

Sentiment analysis applications have spread to many domains: from consumer products, healthcare and financial services to political elections and social events. A common task in opinion mining is to classify an opinionated document into a positive or negative opinion. In this paper, a study of different methodologies is conducted to rank polarity as to better know how the ironic messages affect sentiment analysis tools. The study provides an initial understanding of how irony affects the polarity detection. From the statistic point of view, we realize that there are no significant differences between methodologies. To better understand the phenomenon, it is essential to apply different methods, such as SentiWordNet, based on Lexicon. In this sense, as future work, we aim to explore the use of Lexicon based tools, thus measuring and comparing the attained results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2, 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Platt, J.C.: Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Advances in Kernel Methods, pp. 185−208. MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weitzel, L., Aguiar, R.F., Rodriguez, W.F.G., Heringer, M.G.: How do medical authorities express their sentiment in twitter messages? In: 2014 9th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1−6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weitzel, L., Quaresma, P., Oliveira, J.P.M.D.: Measuring node importance on twitter microblogging. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, pp. 1−7. ACM, Craiova (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J.: LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 1–27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leila Weitzel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weitzel, L., Freire, R.A., Quaresma, P., Gonçalves, T., Prati, R. (2015). How Does Irony Affect Sentiment Analysis Tools?. In: Pereira, F., Machado, P., Costa, E., Cardoso, A. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9273. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23484-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23485-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics