Skip to main content

The Complexity of Plate Probabilistic Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9310))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Plate-based probabilistic models combine a few relational constructs with Bayesian networks, so as to allow one to specify large and repetitive probabilistic networks in a compact and intuitive manner. In this paper we investigate the combined, data and domain complexity of plate models, showing that they range from polynomial to \(\#\mathsf {P}\)-complete to \(\#\mathsf {EXP}\)-complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the definition of plate model in Ref. [10] does not require acyclicity, but this seems to be a necessary requirement in all the relevant literature.

References

  1. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(3), 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Börger, E., Grädel, E., Gurevich, Y.: The Classical Decision Problem. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Buntine, W.L.: Operations for learning with graphical models. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2, 159–225 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cozman, F.G., Mauá, D.D.: Bayesian networks specified using propositional and relational constructs: combined, data, and domain complexity. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3519–3525 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darwiche, A.: Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. de Campos, C.P., Stamoulis, G., Weyland, D.: A structured view on weighted counting with relations to quantum computation and applications. Technical report 133, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilks, W., Thomas, A., Spiegelhalter, D.: A language and program for complex Bayesian modelling. The Stat. 43, 169–178 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaeger, M.: Relational Bayesian networks. In: Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 266–273 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaeger, M., van den Broeck, G.: Upper and lower bounds. In: Statistical Relational AI Workshop, Liftability of Probabilistic Inference (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lunn, D., Jackson, C., Best, N., Thomas, A., Spiegelhalter, D.: The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis. CRC Press/Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N.: The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat. Med. 28, 3049–3067 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Papadimitriou, C.H.: A note on succinct representations of graphs. Inf. Control 71, 181–185 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poole, D.: First-order probabilistic inference. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 985–991 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Markov logic networks. Mach. Learn. 62(1–2), 107–136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth, D.: On the hardness of approximate reasoning. Artif. Intell. 82(1–2), 273–302 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sontag, D., Roy, D.: Complexity of inference in Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 24, 1008–1016 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tobies, S.: The complexity of reasoning with cardinality restrictions and nominals in expressive description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 12, 199–217 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Valiant, L.G.: The complexity of enumeration and reliability problems. SIAM J. Comput. 8(3), 410–421 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author was partially supported by CNPq and the second author was partially supported by FAPESP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio G. Cozman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cozman, F.G., Mauá, D.D. (2015). The Complexity of Plate Probabilistic Models. In: Beierle, C., Dekhtyar, A. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9310. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23539-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23540-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics