Skip to main content

Interactive Transformation Path Generation Using Business Support Maps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 633 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 231))

Abstract

Enterprise architecture (EA) management supports transformation path planning to facilitate the change from the current to the target architecture. We create parts of these transformation paths automatically using the information from current and target business support maps. Restrictions on the business support maps, i.e. areas which shall remain stable and which shall be transformed, are modeled by an enterprise architect to allow for a goal oriented transformation path generation. The transformation paths serve as project proposals for the project portfolio management. Necessary changes to the EA are prioritized and estimated. Our solution uses a graph transformation based approach to allow for an interactive creation of possible transformation paths. The transformation paths are the state transitions of a graph transition system, which we create from an EA model. We weigh the effort of each transformation according cost, time and risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://groove.cs.utwente.nl/.

References

  1. Aier, S., Gleichauf, B.: Application of enterprise models for engineering enterprise transformation. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. 5(1), 56–72 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aier, S., Winter, R.: Virtual decoupling for it/business alignment - conceptual foundations, architecture design and implementation example. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1(2), 150–163 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Analysis and application scenarios of enterprise architecture: An exploratory study. In: 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW 2006), p. 28. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buckl, S., Ernst, A., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: An information model for landscape management – discussing temporality aspects. In: Feuerlicht, G., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5472, pp. 363–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W., Hess, C., Langermeier, M., Stülpnagel, J.V., Diefenthaler, P.: Semantic enterprise architecture management. In: 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2013), pp. 318–325 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dam, H.K., Le, L.S., Ghose, A.: Supporting change propagation in the evolution of enterprise architectures. In: 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2010), pp. 24–33 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diefenthaler, P., Bauer, B.: Gap analysis in enterprise architecture using semantic web technologies. In: 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2013), pp. 211–220 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diefenthaler, P., Bauer, B.: Using gap analysis to support feedback loops for enterprise architecture management. In: Kundisch, D., Suhl, L., Beckmann, L. (eds.) MKWI 2014 - Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik. University of Paderborn, Paderborn (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franke, U., Holschke, O., Buschle, M., Narman, P., Rake-Revelant, J.: It consolidation: an optimization approach. In: 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 21–26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gringel, P., Postina, M.: I-pattern for gap analysis. In: Engels, G., Luckey, M., Pretschner, A., Reussner, R. (eds.) Software Engineering 2010. LNI, pp. 281–292. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Habel, A., Pennemann, K.-H.: Nested constraints and application conditions for high-level structures. In: Kreowski, H.-J., Montanari, U., Orejas, F., Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds.) Formal Methods in Software and Systems Modeling. LNCS, vol. 3393, pp. 293–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Iacob, M.E., Quartel, D., Jonkers, H.: Capturing business strategy and value in enterprise architecture to support portfolio valuation. In: 2012 16th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2012), pp. 11–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lautenbacher, F., Diefenthaler, P., Langermeier, M., Mykhashchuk, M., Bauer, B.: Planning support for enterprise changes. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M., Zdravkovic, J., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 165, pp. 54–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Närman, P., Sommestad, T., Sandgren, S., Ekstedt, M.: A framework for assessing the cost of it investments. In: Kocaoglu, D.F., Anderson, T.R., Daim, T.U. (eds.) Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, pp. 3154–3166 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rensink, A., Zambon, E.: Pattern-based graph abstraction. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7562, pp. 66–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, D.: Application landscape transformation and the role of enterprise architecture frameworks. In: Steffens, U. (ed.) MDD, SOA and IT-Management. GITO, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sousa, S., Marosin, D., Gaaloul, K., Meyer, N.: Assessing risks and opportunities in enterprise architecture using an extended adt approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Applied Optimization, vol. 44. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht and Boston, Mass (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Torre, L.W.N., Lankhorst, M.M., ter Doest, H., Campschroer, J.T.P., Arbab, F.: Landscape maps for enterprise architectures. In: Martinez, F.H., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 351–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Wegmann, A.: On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (seam). In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 483–490 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Winter, R., Fischer, R.: Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. In: 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW 2006), p. 30. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Diefenthaler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diefenthaler, P., Langermeier, M., Bauer, B. (2015). Interactive Transformation Path Generation Using Business Support Maps. In: Barjis, J., Pergl, R., Babkin, E. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24626-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24626-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24626-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics