Abstract
In this paper, we develop a solution for evidence combination, called 2-probabilities focused combination, that concentrates on significant focal elements only. Firstly, in the focal set of each mass function, elements with their probabilities in top two highest probabilities are retained; others are considered as noise, which have been generated when assigning probabilities to the mass function and/or by related evidence combination tasks had already been done before, and eliminated. The probabilities of eliminated elements are added to the probability of the whole set element. The achieved mass functions are called 2-probabilities focused mass functions. Secondly, Dempster’s rule of combination is used to combine pieces of evidence represented as 2-probabilities focused mass functions. Finally, the combination result is transformed into the corresponding 2-probabilities focused mass function. Actually, the proposed solution can be employed as a useful tool for fusing pieces of evidence in recommender systems using soft ratings based on Dempster-Shafer theory; thus, we also present a way to integrate the proposed solution into these systems. Besides, the experimental results show that the performance of the proposed solution is more effective than a typically alternative solution called 2-points focused combination solution.
This research work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 25240049.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, J.A.: Computational methods for a mathematical theory of evidence. In: IJCAI 1981, pp. 868–875 (1981)
Bell, D.A., Guan, J.W., Bi, Y.: On combining classifier mass functions for text categorization. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(10), 1307–1319 (2005)
Bi, Y., Guan, J., Bell, D.A.: The combination of multiple classifiers using an evidential reasoning approach. Artif. Intell. 172(15), 1731–1751 (2008)
Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325–339 (1967)
Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)
Hewawasam, K.K.R., Premaratne, K., Shyu, M.-L.: Rule mining and classification in a situation assessment application: A belief-theoretic approach for handling data imperfections. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part B 37(6), 1446–1459 (2007)
Nguyen, V.-D., Huynh, V.-N.: A community-based collaborative filtering system dealing with sparsity problem and data imperfections. In: Pham, D.-N., Park, S.-B. (eds.) PRICAI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8862, pp. 884–890. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Nguyen, V.-D., Huynh, V.-N.: A reliably weighted collaborative filtering system. In: ECSQARU 2015, pp. 429–439 (2015)
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)
Wickramarathne, T.L., Premaratne, K., Kubat, M., Jayaweera, D.T.: Cofids: A belief-theoretic approach for automated collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23(2), 175–189 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyen, VD., Huynh, VN. (2015). Evidence Combination Focusing on Significant Focal Elements for Recommender Systems. In: Huynh, VN., Inuiguchi, M., Demoeux, T. (eds) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making. IUKM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25135-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25135-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25134-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25135-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)