Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Holonic Institutions for Multi-scale Polycentric Self-governance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems X (COIN 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9372))

Abstract

Effective institutions are key to the success of self-governing systems, yet specifying and maintaining them can be challenging, especially in large-scale, highly dynamic and competitive contexts. Political economist Elinor Ostrom has studied the conventional arrangements for sustainable natural resource management and derived from these eight design principles for self-governing institutions. One principle, nested enterprises, is straightforwardly expressed, but is arguably structural rather than functional, and so is more resistant to declarative specification; yet it also appears to be critical to the effectiveness of complex compositional systems. In this paper, we converge the ideas of holonic systems with electronic institutions, to propose a formalisation of this principle based on holonic institutions. We show how holonic institutions provide a structural framework for nested enterprises, which can be designed as composite systems of systems. This, we believe, is compatible with Ostrom’s ideas for polycentric governance of complex systems. We use a case study in energy distribution to illustrate these ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artikis, A.: Dynamic specification of open agent systems. J. Logic Comput. 22(6), 1301–1334 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cliffe, O., De Vos, M., Padget, J.: Specifying and reasoning about multiple institutions. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 67–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. DeLoach, S.: OMACS: a framework for adaptive, complex systems. In: Dignum, V. (ed.) Multi-Agent Systems Semantics and Dynamics of Organisational Models. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: A logic of agent organizations. Logic J. IGPL 20(1), 216–283 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer, K.: Holonic multiagent systems – theory and applications. In: Barahona, P., Alferes, J.J. (eds.) EPIA 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1695, pp. 34–48. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Frey, S., Diaconescu, A., Menga, D., Demeure, I.: A holonic control architecture for a heterogeneous multi-objective smart micro-grid. In: IEEE 7th International Confrence on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), pp. 21–30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.: Implementing norms in electronic institutions. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 667–673. ACM Press, NewYork (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hübner, J., Sichman, J., Boissier, O.: Developing organised multiagent systems using the MOISE\(^{+}\) model. IJAOSE 1(3/4), 370–395 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koestler, A.: The Ghost in the Machine. Hutchinson Publisher, London (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kohler, T., Steghöfer, J.P., Busquets, D., Pitt, J.: The value of fairness: trade-offs in repeated dynamic resource allocation. In: Proceedings 8th IEEE Conference on Self-Adapting and Self-Organising Systems (SASO) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Gener. Comput. 4, 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minsky, N.: Law-Governed Interaction (LGI): A Distributed Coordination and Control Mechanism. Rutgers University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Kus, M., Urbaniak, J.: The dynamics of societal transition: modeling non-linear change in the polish economic system. Int. J. Sociol. 35, 65–68 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ostrom, E.: Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. In: Grandin, K. (ed.) Les Prix Nobel, The Nobel Prizes 2009, pp. 408–444. Nobel Foundation, Stockholm (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ostrom, E.: Thinking about climate change as a commons. In: 15th Annual Philip Gamble Memorial Lecture, pp. 1–34. UMass Amherst (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.: Foundations of Social Capital. Edward Elgar Pub, Cheltenham (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ostrom, E.: Governing the commons. Cambridge University Pressm, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel, J., Teacy, W., Jennings, N., Luck, M., Chalmers, S., Oren, N., Norman, T., Preece, A., Gray, P., Shercliff, G., Stockreisser, P., Shao, J., Gray, W., Fiddian, N., Thompson, S.: Agent-based virtual organisations for the grid. Multiagent Grid Syst. 1(4), 237–249 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitt, J., Busquets, D., Macbeth, S.: Distributive justice for self-organised common-pool resource management. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 9(3), 14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitt, J., Schaumeier, J., Artikis, A.: Axiomatisation of socio-economic principles for self-organising institutions: concepts, experiments and challenges. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 7(4), 39:1–39:39 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. RCEP: 28th report: Adapting institutions to climate change. Royal Commission on Environmental Protection, The Stationery Office Limited (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rescher, N.: Distributive Justice. Bobbs-Merrill, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez, S., Gaud, N., Hilaire, V., Galland, S., Koukam, A.: An analysis and design concept for self-organization in holonic multi-agent systems. In: Brueckner, S.A., Hassas, S., Jelasity, M., Yamins, D. (eds.) ESOA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4335, pp. 15–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanduleac, M., Eremia, M., Toma, L., Borza, P.: Integrating the electrical vehicles in the smart grid through unbundled smart metering and multi-objective virtual power plants. In: 2nd IEEE PES International Conference Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT Europe 2011, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. SESIG: Smart Energy Special Interest Group: The role of community energy systems in the UK resilient energy supply. Technical report, Innovate UK (Technology Strategy Board) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simon, H.: The architecture of complexity. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 106(6), 467–482 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steghöfer, J.P., Anders, G., Siefert, F., Reif, W.: A system of systems approach to the evolutionary transformation of power management systems. In: GI Jahrestagung, pp. 1500–1515 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ulieru, M., Brennan, R., Walker, S.: The holonic enterprise: a model for internet-enabled global manufacturing supply chain and workflow management, integrated Manufacturing Systems. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 13(8), 538–550 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Valckenaers, P., Brussel, H.V., Holvoet, T.: Fundamentals of holonic systems and their implications for self-adaptive and self-organizing systems. In: IEEE SASO Workshops (SASOW) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jeremy Pitt was partially supported by the UK EPSRC Grand Challenge project The Autonomic Power System (EP/I031650/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Telecom ParisTech, 46 Rue Barrault, 75634, Paris Cedex 13, France

    Ada Diaconescu

  2. Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2BT, UK

    Jeremy Pitt

Authors
  1. Ada Diaconescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Pitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Pitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science &, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

    Aditya Ghose

  2. Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

    Nir Oren

  3. Cisco Systems Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA

    Pankaj Telang

  4. Comp. Science and Information Technol., RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    John Thangarajah

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diaconescu, A., Pitt, J. (2015). Holonic Institutions for Multi-scale Polycentric Self-governance. In: Ghose, A., Oren, N., Telang, P., Thangarajah, J. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems X. COIN 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9372. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25419-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25420-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics