Abstract
Human space flight is a prototypical example of a complex, dynamic, and safety-critical domain in which missions are performed by collaborative teams of humans and technical systems. In such domains, intelligent electronic partners (ePartners) can play a useful role in supporting human-robot teams in their problem solving process whenever a non-nominal situation is encountered. To enhance the supportive capabilities of such ePartners, this paper presents an approach to formally represent the functionality of human-robot teams in terms of different levels of abstraction. By establishing formal relations between domain knowledge at different abstraction levels and introducing reasoning rules to navigate through these relations, ePartners are endowed with a number of supportive functions, such as the ability to reason about the mission status, make suggestions in non-nominal situations, and provide explanations. The approach is applied to a use case in the context of a manned space mission to Mars. It has been implemented within a mobile application to assist robot-astronaut teams during space missions, and has been tested in a pilot experiment at the European Space Research and Technology Centre.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van der Aalst, W.M., ter Hofstede, A.H., Weske, M.: Business process management: a survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Baker, C., Naikar, N., Neerincx, M.A.: Engineering planetary exploration systems: integrating novel technologies and the human element using work domain analysis. In: Proceedings of the 59th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2008)
Bisantz, A.M., Vicente, K.J.: Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies 40, 83–117 (1994)
Bosse, T., Duell, R., Hoogendoorn, M., Klein, M., van Lambalgen, R., van der Mee, A., Oorburg, R., Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J., de Vos, M.: A generic personal assistant agent model for support in demanding tasks. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Estabrooke, I.V., Grootjen, M. (eds.) FAC 2009. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 5638, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Coyne, R.: Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies 26, 5–17 (2005)
Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K.: Beyond the macho approach of artificial intelligence: empower human designers — do not replace them. Knowledge-Based Systems 5(1), 15–30 (1992)
Halpin, T.: Object-role modeling (ORM/NIAM). In: Bernus, P. et al. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp 81–103. Springer Verlag (2006)
Ham, D.-H.: Modelling work domain knowledge with the combined use of abstraction hierarchy and living systems theory. Cognition, Technology & Work, April 2015. Springer Verlag (2015)
Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P.J., Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Sierhuis, M.: Coactive Design: Designing Support for Interdependence in Joint Activity. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(1), 43–69 (2014)
Myers, K., Berry, P., Blythe, J., Conley, K., Gervasio, M., McGuinness, D.L., Morley, D., Pfeffer, A., Pollack, M., Tambe, M.: An Intelligent Personal Assistant for Task and Time Management. AI Magazine, Summer 2007, 47–61 (2007)
Neerincx, M.A.: Situated Cognitive Engineering for Crew Support in Space. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15(5), 445–456 (2011)
Neerincx, M.A., Bos, A., Olmedo-Soler, A., Brauer, U., Wolff, M.: The mission execution crew assistant: improving human-machine team resilience for long duration missions. In: Proc. of the 59th Int. Astronautical Congress (IAC 2008) (2008)
Neerincx, M.A., Grant, T.: Evolution of Electronic Partners: Human-Automation Operations and ePartners During Planetary Missions. Journal of Cosmology 12, 3825–3833 (2010)
Olmedo Soler, A., Smets, N., Neerincx, M.A., van Diggelen, J., Baggerman, J.W., Breebaart, L., Rosa, J., Plassmeier, F.: HEART Requirements. Technical report for the ESA project MECA-HEART (2014). http://www.crewassistant.com/docs/pub/MECA_HEART/MECA_HEART_WP1_D1a_sCET_report_v2.pdf
Plassmeier, F., Baggerman, J.W., Bosse, T., van Diggelen, J., Smets, N.: Mission Simulation Specification. Technical report for the ESA project MECA-HEART (2015). http://www.crewassistant.com/docs/pub/MECA_HEART/MECA_HEART-WP3-D2b-MissionSimulationSpecs.pdf
Rasmussen, J., Lind, M.: Coping with complexity. Risø-M-2293, Electronics Department, Risø Nat. Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark (1981)
Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)
Vicente, K.J.: Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges. Hum. Factors 44, 62–78 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bosse, T., van Diggelen, J., Neerincx, M.A., Smets, N.J.J.M. (2015). Supporting Human-Robot Teams in Space Missions Using ePartners and Formal Abstraction Hierarchies. In: Chen, Q., Torroni, P., Villata, S., Hsu, J., Omicini, A. (eds) PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25523-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25524-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)