Abstract
Gaze following occurs automatically in social interactions, but the degree to which we follow gaze strongly depends on whether an agent is believed to have a mind and is therefore socially relevant for the interaction. The current paper investigates whether the social relevance of a robot can be manipulated via its physical appearance and whether there is a linear relationship between appearance and gaze following in a counter-predictive gaze cueing paradigm (i.e., target appears with a high likelihood opposite of the gazed-at location). Results show that while robots are capable of inducing gaze following, the degree to which gaze is passively followed does not linearly decrease with physical human-likeness. Rather, the relationship between appearance and gaze following is best described by an inverted u-shaped pattern, with automatic cueing effects (i.e., attending to the cued location) for agents of mixed human-likeness and reversed cueing effects (i.e., attending to the predicted location) for agents of either full human-likeness (100% human) or full robot-likeness (100% robot). The results are interpreted with regard to cognitive resource theory and design implications are discussed.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4), 531–534 (2006)
Graham, R., Friesen, C., Fichtenholtz, H.M., LaBar, K.S.: Modulation of reflexive orienting to gaze direction by facial expressions. Vis. Cogn. 18(3), 331–368 (2010)
Azarian, B., Esser, E.G., Peterson, M.S.: Watch out! Directional threat-related postures cue attention and the eyes. Cognition & Emotion 1-9 (2015)
Friesen, C.K., Kingstone, A.: The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon. B. Rev. 5(3), 490–495 (1998)
Posner, M.I.: Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32(1), 3–25 (1980)
Kawai, N.: Attentional shift by eye gaze requires joint attention: Eye gaze cues are unique to shift attention. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 53(3), 292–301 (2011)
Ristic, J., Kingstone, A.: Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition 94(3), B55–B65 (2005)
Teufel, C., Alexis, D.M., Clayton, N.S., Davis, G.: Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72(3), 695–705 (2010)
Teufel, C., Alexis, D.M., Todd, H., Lawrance-Owen, A.J., Clayton, N.S., Davis, G.: Social cognition modulates the sensory coding of observed gaze direction. Curr. Biol. 19(15), 1274–1277 (2009)
Jonides, J., Irwin, D.E.: Capturing attention. Cognition 10(1), 145–150 (1981)
Müller, H.J., Rabbitt, P.M.: Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J. Exp. Psychol.-Hum. Percept. Perform. 15(2), 315 (1989)
Frith, U., Frith, C.D.: Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358(1431), 459–473 (2003)
Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J., Müller, H.J.: I see what you mean: how attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PLOS ONE 7(9), e45391 (2012)
Wykowska, A., Wiese, E., Prosser, A., Müller, H.J.: Beliefs about the minds of others influence how we process sensory information. PLOS ONE 9(4), e94339 (2014)
Admoni, H., Bank, C., Tan, J., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1983-1988, Boston (2011)
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42, 143–166 (2003)
Hackel, L.M., Looser, C.E., Van Bavel, J.J.: Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 15–23 (2014)
Martini, M.C., Gonzalez, C.A., Wiese, E.: Seeing minds in others– Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences?. In preparation
Powers, K.E., Worsham, A.L., Freeman, J.B., Wheatley, T., Heatherton, T.F.: Social connection modulates perceptions of animacy. Psychol. Sci. 25(10), 1943–1948 (2014)
Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., Öhman, A.: The Karolinska directed emotional faces (KDEF). CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, pp. 91-630 (1998)
Park, E., Kong, H., Lim, H.T., Lee, J., You, S., del Pobil, A.P.: The effect of robot’s behavior vs. appearance on communication with humans. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 219-220. ACM, March 2011
Bartlett, F.C.: Remembering. Cambridge University Press, London (1932)
Shapiro, A.M.: The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 20(22), 143–167 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martini, M.C., Buzzell, G.A., Wiese, E. (2015). Agent Appearance Modulates Mind Attribution and Social Attention in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25553-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25554-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)