Skip to main content

Cartographic Visualisation of Noise and Aspects of Public Understanding of this Information

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

  • 1426 Accesses

Abstract

Maps are the major instrument for the assessment of noise in European cities. They are the basis for informing the public and for formulating action plans. Environmental noise that is the subject of this chapter is defined as “unwanted or harmful outdoor sound created by human activities, including noise emitted by means of transport, road traffic, rail traffic, air traffic, and from sites of industrial activity” (European Parliament and Council 2002, Art. 2(1)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Aarhus Convention, adopted in 1998 by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), gives everyone the right to access environmental information that is held by public authorities, the right to participate in environmental decision-making, and the right to review procedures to challenge public decisions (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/).

  2. 2.

    LAeq or Leq is the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level (cf. Sect. 9.2.3) that is, for example, the main indicator for aircraft noise in the UK. It describes the daily average movements during the 16-h day (7–23 o’clock local time) calculated over the 92-day summer period (16 June–15 September).

  3. 3.

    Relevant community legislation is for example Directive 2003/4/EC that repeals Directive 90/313/EEC that was addressed in the END.

  4. 4.

    This means de-logarithmised, added or averaged, and then logarithmised again.

  5. 5.

    Lden is the A-weighted (cf. Sect. 9.2.3) long-term average sound level for daytime, evening and nighttime (7 am–7 pm, 7 pm–11 pm, 11 pm–7 am, with possible offsets for certain countries). An extra 5 dB is added for the evening level and 10 dB for the night level.

  6. 6.

    This was the status at the editorial deadline of this volume in November 2015. The German Industrial Standard DIN 18005-2 (Beuth 1991) will be replaced by DIN 45682 that was under revision at the editorial deadline.

  7. 7.

    Vierunddreißigste Verordnung zur Durchführung des Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetzes (Verordnung über die Lärmkartierung) vom 6. März 2006 (BGBl. I S. 516).

  8. 8.

    An example for a web track site is https://de.flightaware.com/live/airport/EGLL.

  9. 9.

    The Sound Exposure Level is the “the sound level, in dB, of a one second burst of steady noise that contains the same total sound energy as the whole event. In other words, it is the value that would be measured if the energy of the entire event were compressed into a constant sound level lasting for one second.” (Airports Commission 2013a, p. 19).

  10. 10.

    Department for Transport (2007) Attitudes to Noise from Aviation Sources in England (ANASE) study.

  11. 11.

    http://www.widetag.com/widenoise/ (accessed April 2014).

  12. 12.

    http://www.noisetube.net/download (accessed April 2014).

  13. 13.

    http://www.da-sense.de/ (accessed April 2014).

References

  • Airports Commission: Discussion Paper 05: Airport Noise. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223764/airports-commission-noise.pdf (2013a). Accessed April 2015

  • Airports Commission: Discussion Paper 05: Aviation Noise, London (2013b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviation Environment Federation (AEF): Approach Noise at Heathrow: Concentrating the Problem, An AEF Report for HACAN. Aviation Environment Federation, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuth: DIN 18005-2:1991, Noise Abatement in Town Planning: Noise Maps: Graphical Representation of Noise Pollution. Beuth, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, C.A.: Color use guidelines for mapping and visualization. In: MacEachren, A., Taylor, D.R.F. (eds.) Visualization in Modern Cartography. Elsevier Science, Tarrytown, NY (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruitparif: http://carto.bruitparif.fr/carte_grandpublic_allege/flash/ (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • Civil Aviation Authority: ERCD REPORT 1301, Noise Exposure Contours for Heathrow Airport 2012. Civil Aviation Authority, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council: Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (END) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Da_sense: http://www.da-sense.de/ (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • Defra (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs): http://services.defra.gov.uk/wps/portal/noise (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • European Commission (EC): http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/home.htm (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • European Environmental Agency: Good Practice Guide on Noise Exposure and Potential Health Effects. EEA, Copenhagen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • EveryAware: http://www.everyaware.eu/ (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • Fletcher, H., Munson, W.A.: Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82–108 (1933)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gov.uk: Heathrow actual contours average mode summer 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/noise-contours-on-os-maps (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • Gunther, L.: The Physics of Music and Color. Springer, New York/Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauthal, E., Burghardt, D.: Mapping space-related emotions out of user-generated photo metadata considering grammatical issues. Cartogr. J. (2014) (published online). doi:10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000094

  • ISO: ISO 1996-2:1987, Acoustics—Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise—Part 2: Acquisition of Data Pertinent to Land Use. ISO, Geneva (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO: ISO 226:2003, Acoustics—Normal equal-loudness-level contours (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, B., Kelso, N.V.: Color design for the color vision impaired. Cartogr. Perspect. 58, 61–67 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., Tutton, R.: Shifting subject positions, experts and lay people in public dialogue. Soc. Stud. Sci. 37(3), 385–411 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinkeldey, C.: Development of a prototype for uncertainty-aware geovisual analytics of land cover change. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 28, 2076–2089 (2014). doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.891037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luebbe, E.: Farbempfindung, Farbbeschreibung und Farbmessung: Eine Formel für die Farbsättigung. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • NoiseTube: http://noisetube.net (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • Schiewe, J., Weninger, B.: Visual encoding of acoustic parameters—framework and application to noise mapping. Cartogr. J. 50(4), 332–344 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.J.: Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 377–405 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, W.: Principles of Modeling Uncertainties in Spatial Data and Spatial Analyses. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtentwicklung Berlin: http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/umweltatlas/ka705.htm (2014). Accessed April 2014

  • Stevens, M.: Community Memories for Sustainable Societies: The Case of Environmental Noise. VUBPress, Brussels (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP): Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weninger, B.: The effects of colour on the interpretation of official noise maps. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference 2013 in Dresden, available at http://www.icc2013.org/_contxt/_medien/_upload/_proceeding/285_proceeding.pdf (2013). Accessed April 2014

  • Weninger, B.: A framework for color design of digital maps—an example of noise maps. In: Brus, J., Vondrakova, A., Vozenilek, V. (eds.) CARTOCON 2014—Modern Trends in Cartography. Springer, Berlin (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weninger, B.: A color scheme for the presentation of sound immission in maps: requirements and principles for design. In: Proceedings, EuroNoise, 10th European Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, European Acoustics Association, May 31–Jun 3, 2015, Maastricht, The Netherlands (2015b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weninger, B.: An initial analysis of design parameters affecting the interpretation of noise maps: insights gained in empirical research. Kartographische Nachrichten 65(4), 208–216 (2015c)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO): Guidelines for Community Noise. World Health Organization, Geneva (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO): http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/environment-and-health/noise/data-and-statistics (2013). Accessed April 2014

  • Wynne, B.: Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Underst. Sci. 1(3), 281–304 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work is based on results gained within the project ‘Evaluation and Optimization of noise action planning according to Environmental Noise Directive 2002/49/ EG’, funded by the Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt) of Germany (UFOPLAN FKZ 371055146). I would like to thank our project partners from Laermkontor GmbH (Hamburg) for their valuable input. Figure  9.3 is based on fictitious data of the project ‘Silent City’, funded by the Federal Environment Agency and delivered by Laermkontor GmbH. The focus group interview was conducted at the Extreme Citizen Science Research Group (ExCiteS) at UCL. I would like to thank Prof. Muki Haklay and colleagues, especially Christian Nold, for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate Tomio (Weninger) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomio (Weninger), B. (2017). Cartographic Visualisation of Noise and Aspects of Public Understanding of this Information. In: Loreto, V., et al. Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics