Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation of Acoustic Feedback Cancellation Methods in Single-Microphone and Multiple-Loudspeakers Public Address Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 554))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Acoustic feedback limits the maximum stable gain (MSG) of a public address (PA) system and thereby may make the system unstable. Acoustic feedback cancellation methods use an adaptive filter to identify the acoustic feedback path and remove its influence from the system. However, if the traditional adaptive filtering algorithms are used, a bias is introduced in the adaptive filter coefficients. Several methods have been proposed to overcome the bias problem but their performances are generally evaluated in PA systems with only one microphone and one loudspeaker. This work evaluates the performance of some state-of-art methods in a PA system with one microphone and four loudspeakers, which is a more practical configuration of such a system, with respect to the increase in MSG, estimate of the feedback path and sound quality. Simulation results demonstrated that, when the source signal is speech, the method based on the cepstrum of the error signal has the best overall performance and can increase in 30.6 dB the MSG of the PA system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ANSI: ANSI S3.5: American national standard methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index. American National Standard Institute (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benesty, J., Morgan, D.R., Sondhi, M.M.: A better understanding an a improved solution to the specific problems of stereophonic acoustic echo cancellation. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 6(2), 156–165 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bispo, B.C., Freitas, D.R.S.: Evaluation of acoustic feedback cancellation methods with multiple feedback paths. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications, pp. 127–133, Vienna, Austria, August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bispo, B.C., Freitas, D.R.S.: On the use of cepstral analysis in acoustic feedback cancellation. Digital Signal Proc. 44, 88–101 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bispo, B.C., Esquef, P.A.A., Biscainho, L.W.P., de Lima, A.A., Freeland, F.P., de Jesus, R.A., Said, A., Lee, B., Schafer, R.W., Kalker, T.: EW-PESQ: a quality assessment method for speech signals sampled at 48 kHz. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 58(4), 251–268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bispo, B.C., Rodrigues, P.M.L., Freitas, D.R.S.: Acoustic feedback cancellation based on cepstral analysis. In: Proceedings of 17th IEEE Conference on Signal Processing Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements and Applications, pp. 205–209, Poznan, Poland, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. Das, R.L., Chakraborty, M.: Sparse adaptive filters - an overview and some new results. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 2745–2748, Seoul, South Korea, May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forssel, U.: Closed-loop identifcation: methods, theory, and applications. Ph.D. thesis, Linköpings Universitet (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, M., Jensen, S.H., Jensen, J.: Novel acoustic feedback cancellation approaches in hearing aid applications using probe noise and probe noise enhancement. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 20(9), 2549–2563 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, M., Jensen, S.H., Jensen, J., Grant, S.L.: On the use of a phase modulation method for decorrelation in acoustic feedback cancellation. In: Proceedings of 20th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 2000–2004, Bucharest, Romania, August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hellgren, J.: Analysis of feedback cancellation in hearing aids with Filtered-X LMS and the direct method of closed loop identification. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 10(2), 119–131 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hellgren, J., Forssell, U.: Bias of feedback cancellation algorithms in hearing aids based on direct closed loop identification. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 9(7), 906–913 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ITU-T P.862.2: Wideband extention to recommendation P.862 for the assessment of wideband telephone networks and speech codecs. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ITU-T P.862.3: Application guide for objective quality measurement based on recommendations P.862, P.862.1 and P.862.2. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeub, M., Schäfer, M., Vary, P.: A binaural room impulse response database for the evaluation of dereverberation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, Santorini, Greece, July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khong, A.W., Naylor, P.A.: Efficient use of sparse adaptive filters. In: Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, USA, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Lima, A.A., Freeland, F.P., Esquef, P.A.A., Biscainho, L.W.P., Bispo, B.C., de Jesus, R.A., Netto, S.L., Schafer, R.W., Said, A., Lee, B., Kalker, T.: Reverberation assessment in audioband speech signals for telepresence systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications, pp. 257–262, Porto, Portugal, July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Lima, A.A., Freeland, F.P., de Jesus, R.A., Bispo, B.C., Biscainho, L.W.P., Netto, S.L., Said, A., Kalker, T., Schafer, R.W., Lee, B., Jam, M.: On the quality assessment of sound signals. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 416–419, Seattle, USA, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Lima, A.A., Netto, S.L., Biscainho, L.W.P., Freeland, F.P., Bispo, B.C., de Jesus, R.A., Schafer, R., Said, A., Lee, B., Kalker, T.: Quality evaluation of reverberation in audioband speech signals. In: Filipe, J., Obaidat, M.S. (eds.) ICETE 2008. CCIS, vol. 48, pp. 384–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Ljung, L.: System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramachandran, R.P., Kabal, P.: Pitch prediction filter in speech conding. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Sig. Process. 37(4), 467–478 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rombouts, G., Spriet, A., Moonen, M.: Generalized sidelobe canceller based combined acoustic feedback- and noise cancellation. Sig. Process. 88(3), 571–581 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rombouts, G., van Waterschoot, T., Struyve, K., Moonen, M.: Acoustic feedback cancellation for long acoustic paths using a nonstationary source model. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54(9), 3426–3434 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Siqueira, M.G., Alwan, A.: Steady-state analysis of continuous adaptation in acoustic feedback reduction systems for hearing-aids. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 8(4), 443–453 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spriet, A., Proudler, I., Moonen, M., Wouters, J.: Adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids with linear prediction of the desired signal. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 53(10), 3749–3763 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. van Waterschoot, T., Moonen, M.: Adaptive feedback cancellation for audio applications. Sig. Process. 89(11), 2185–2201 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. van Waterschoot, T., Moonen, M.: Assessing the acoustic feedback control performance of adaptive feedback cancellation in sound reinforcement systems. In: Proceedings of 17th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 1997–2001, Glasgow, Scotland, August 2009

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Waterschoot, T., Moonen, M.: Fifty years of acoustic feedback control: state of the art and future challenges. Proc. IEEE 99(2), 288–327 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the FCT (Portuguese National Science and Technology Foundation) through the scholarship SFRH/BD/49038/2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno C. Bispo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bispo, B.C., Freitas, D. (2015). Performance Evaluation of Acoustic Feedback Cancellation Methods in Single-Microphone and Multiple-Loudspeakers Public Address Systems. In: Obaidat, M., Holzinger, A., Filipe, J. (eds) E-Business and Telecommunications. ICETE 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25915-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25915-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25914-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25915-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics