Skip to main content

On the Minimal Constraint Satisfaction Problem: Complexity and Generation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Combinatorial Optimization and Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9486))

Abstract

The Minimal Constraint Satisfaction Problem, or Minimal CSP for short, arises in a number of real-world applications, most notably in constraint-based product configuration. Despite its very permissive structure, it is NP-hard, even when bounding the size of the domains by \(d\ge 9\). Yet very little is known about the Minimal CSP beyond that. Our contribution through this paper is twofold. Firstly, we generalize the complexity result to any value of d. We prove that the Minimal CSP remains NP-hard for \(d\ge 3\), as well as for \(d=2\) if the arity k of the instances is strictly greater than 2. Our complexity result can be seen as providing a dichotomy theorem for the Minimal CSP. Secondly, we build a generator that can create Minimal CSP instances of any size, using the constrainedness as a parameter. Our generator can be used to study behaviors that are typical of NP-hard problems, such as the presence of a phase transition, in the case of the Minimal CSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We are aware that finding a solution to a Minimal CSP is both a search problem (find a solution) and a promise problem (the input CSP is satisfiable because it is minimal), rather that a decision problem. However, we use this terminology in the same manner as Gottlob [6], where a thorough discussion of the matter can be found.

  2. 2.

    Our experiments are run under CentOS 6.6, on two Intel processors (1.33 Ghz each), and with 12 GB of DDR2 FB-DIMM RAM.

References

  1. Achlioptas, D., Gomes, C., Kautz, H., Selman, B.: Generating satisfiable problem instances. In: Kautz, H.A., Porter, B.W. (eds.) Proceedings of AAAI, pp. 256–261. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amilhastre, J., Fargier, H., Marquis, P.: Consistency restoration and explanations in dynamic csps application to configuration. Artif. Intell. 135(1–2), 199–234 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, D.A., Frank, J., Gent, I.P., MacIntyre, E., Tomov, N., Walsh, T.: Local search and the number of solutions. In: Freuder, Eugene C. (ed.) CP 1996. LNCS, vol. 1118. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freuder, E.C.: A sufficient condition for backtrack-bounded search. J. ACM 32(4), 755–761 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gent, I.P., MacIntyre, E., Prosser, P., Walsh, T.: The constrainedness of search. In: Clancey, W.J., Weld, D.S. (eds.) Proceedings of AAAI, pp. 246–252. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gottlob, G.: On minimal constraint networks. Artif. Intell. 191–192, 42–60 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hogg, T., Huberman, B.A., Williams, C.P.: Phase transitions and the search problem. Artif. Intell. 81(1–2), 1–15 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Junker, U.: Configuration. In: Handbook of Constraint Programming. Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 837–873. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schaefer, T.J.: The complexity of satisfiability problems. In: Lipton, R.J., Burkhard, W.A., Savitch, W.J., Friedman, E.P., Aho, A.V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1–3 May 1978, San Diego, pp. 216–226. ACM (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, K., Li, W.: Exact phase transitions in random constraint satisfaction problems. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 12, 93–103 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, K., Li, W.: Many hard examples in exact phase transitions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 355(3), 291–302 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

This publication has emanated from research conducted with the financial support of Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant Number SFI/12/RC/2289.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Escamocher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Escamocher, G., O’Sullivan, B. (2015). On the Minimal Constraint Satisfaction Problem: Complexity and Generation. In: Lu, Z., Kim, D., Wu, W., Li, W., Du, DZ. (eds) Combinatorial Optimization and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9486. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26626-8_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26626-8_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26625-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26626-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics