Skip to main content

Impacts of SAP HANA on Business Intelligence (BI) Strategy Formulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multidimensional Views on Enterprise Information Systems

Abstract

Many organizations are still focusing their BI activities solely on reporting (descriptive analytics). Since reports inherently provide information that just results in reactive measures rather than proactive and innovative actions, the outcome frequently implicate competitive disadvantage through slower discovery of insights, slower reaction times, and decreased abilities to effectively steer the company. Hence, the usage of BI technologies in companies should be expanded up to a point where business users are able to understand “Why” a business event is happening, instead of just receiving an answer on “What” has happened [1, 2]. With an effective and efficient BI environment, organizations are able to increase the value of the business sustainably [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galberaith, S.: Midmarket insights: ‘Why’ reporting alone isn’t a strong enough business intelligence strategy. http://www.gartner.com/technol-ogy/reprints.do?id=1-1I4BR0R&ct=130805&st=sg (2013)

  2. Davenport, T.H.: What do we talk when we talk about analytics? In: Davenport, T.H. (ed.) Enterprise analytics, optimize performance, process and decision through big data, pp. 9–18. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olszak, C.M., Ziemba, E.: Critical success factors for implementing business intelligence systems in small and medium enterprises on the example of upper Silesia, Poland. Interdisc. J. Inf. Knowl. Manage. 7, 129–151 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer, J.: Business Intelligence Strategy: A Practical Guide for Achieving BI Excellence. MC Press, Ketchum (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawking, P.: Business intelligence excellence: a company’s journey to business intelligence maturity. Int. J. Technol. Knowl. Soc. 8(2), 91–99 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eich, M.H.: Database machines and knowledge base machines. Kluwer Int. Ser. Eng. Comput. Sci. 43, 325–338 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vom Brocke, J., Debortoli, S., Müller, O., Reuter, N.: How in-memory technology can create business value: insights from The Hilti Case. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 151–168 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bain, W.: Using in-memory computing to simplify big data analytics. http://www.datanami.com/datanami/2012-10-02/using_in-memory_computing_to_simplify_big_data_analytics.html (2012)

  9. Wust, J., Boese, J.-H., Renkes, F., Blessing, S., Krueger, J., Plattner, H.: Efficient logging for enterprise workloads on column-oriented in-memory databases. In: Chen, X., Lebanon, G., Wang, H., Zaki, M.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 2085–2089. ACM, Maui, Hawaii (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knabke, T., Olbrich, S.: Towards agile BI: applying in-memory technology to data warehouse architectures. In: Lehner, W., Piller, G. (eds.) Proceedings zur Tagung Innovative Unternehmensanwendungen mit In-Memory Data Management, pp. 101–114 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma, S.: Big data landscape. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 3(6), 861–868 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plattner, H., Zeier, A.: In-Memory Data Management: An Inflection Point for Enterprise Applications. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Word, J.: SAP HANA Essential, 3rd edn. Epistemy Press, Frisco (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., Narasayya, V.: An overview of business intelligence technology. Commun. ACM 54(8), 88–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grund, M., Krueger, J., Tinnefeld, C., Zeier, A.: Vertical partitioning in insert-only scenarios for enterprise applications. In: Qi, E. (ed.), 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 760–765. IEEE, Beijing, China (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.saphana.com/docs/DOC-2272. Accessed Jan 2015

  17. Haupt, J.: LSA++ (Layered Scalable Architecture) for SAP NetWeaver on SAP HANA. EIM 203. SAP AG. http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7076b1f6-e942-3010-d1b9-ecd1416458a5?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&57909044127356 (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva-Maria Furtner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Furtner, EM., Wildhölzl, H., Schlager-Weidinger, N., Promberger, K. (2016). Impacts of SAP HANA on Business Intelligence (BI) Strategy Formulation. In: Piazolo, F., Felderer, M. (eds) Multidimensional Views on Enterprise Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27043-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics