Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metamodel and Model Composition by Integration of Operational Semantics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 580))

Abstract

Several metamodel composition mechanisms have been proposed during the course of the last decade. However, most of the composition mechanisms do not consider existing models or other artefacts like editors, transformations and semantics which are defined relatively to a metamodel. Consequently, the models and the artefacts typically become invalid as metamodels are composed. Moreover, very few of the available metamodel composition mechanisms support composition of metamodels’ operational semantics. In this paper we discuss an approach for composing metamodels, and their models, by integrating their operational semantics. This is achieved by using a placeholder mechanism; classes in one metamodel may represent classes of other metamodels. We have validated our approach by the construction of a framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    References are not currently supported.

  2. 2.

    The method generates reflective code for invocation of an operation.

References

  1. Morin, B., Perrouin, G., Lahire, P., Barais, O., Vanwormhoudt, G., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Weaving variability into domain metamodels. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 690–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleurey, F., Baudry, B., France, R.B., Ghosh, S.: A generic approach for automatic model composition. In: Giese, H. (ed.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5002, pp. 7–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: Merging models with the Epsilon Merging Language (EML). In: Wang, J., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Groher, I., Voelter, M.: Xweave - models and aspects in concert. In: 10th International Workshop on Aspect-Oriented Modeling (AOM 2007), pp. 35–40. ACM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Ruscio, D., Iovino, L., Pierantonio, A.: Evolutionary togetherness: how to manage coupled evolution in metamodeling ecosystems. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7562, pp. 20–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. García, J., Diaz, O., Azanza, M.: Model transformation co-evolution: a semi-automatic approach. In: Czarnecki, K., Hedin, G. (eds.) SLE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7745, pp. 144–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Demuth, A., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Egyed, A.: Supporting the co-evolution of metamodels and constraints through incremental constraint management. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds.) MODELS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8107, pp. 287–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. OMG: Meta object facility (mof) core specification (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. EMF: Eclipse modeling framework (emf) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muller, P.-A., Fleurey, F., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Weaving executability into object-oriented meta-languages. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 264–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Benz, S., Juergens, E.: COPE - Automating coupled evolution of metamodels and models. In: Drossopoulou, S. (ed.) ECOOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5653, pp. 52–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wachsmuth, G.: Metamodel adaptation and model co-adaptation. In: Ernst, E. (ed.) ECOOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4609, pp. 600–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A.: Automating co-evolution in model-driven engineering. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A.: Meta-model differences for supporting model co-evolution. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Model-Driven Software Evolution (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Vermolen, S.D., Wachsmuth, G.: An extensive catalog of operators for the coupled evolution of metamodels and models. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 163–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoisl, B., Hu, Z., Hidaka, S.: Towards co-evolution in model-driven development via bidirectional higher-order transformation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development. Springer (2014, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Lara, J., Guerra, E.: From types to type requirements: genericity for model-driven engineering. Softw. Syst. Model. 12, 453–474 (2011). Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steel, J., Jzquel, J.M.: On model typing. Softw. Syst. Model. 6(4), 401–413 (2007). Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Henning Berg & Birger Møller-Pedersen

Authors
  1. Henning Berg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Birger Møller-Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henning Berg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. SOFTEAM, Paris, France

    Philippe Desfray

  2. Department of Systems and Informatics, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal

    Joaquim Filipe

  3. MODESTE/ESEO, Angers, France

    Slimane Hammoudi

  4. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Luís Ferreira Pires

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berg, H., Møller-Pedersen, B. (2015). Metamodel and Model Composition by Integration of Operational Semantics. In: Desfray, P., Filipe, J., Hammoudi, S., Pires, L. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development. MODELSWARD 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27869-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27869-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27868-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27869-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation