Abstract
Subject metadata has an important role in supporting subject access to information resources in digital libraries. Existing subject indexing systems generally produce binary outcomes (either assign or not assign a subject descriptor) that do not adequately reflect the extent to which a document is associated with the assigned subject descriptors. An automated weighting mechanism for subject descriptors is needed to strengthen the role of the subject metadata field. This study compares five measures for automated weighting subject descriptors in documents. The performance of the measures is evaluated according to their ability to discriminate major descriptors from non-major ones. Experiments on a medical collection with 348,566 articles suggest that all the measures are able to rank the major descriptors significantly higher than the non-major ones. Jaccard coefficient, Cosine similarity, and KL Divergence showed better performance than Mutual Information and Log Likelihood Ratio. The findings of this study contribute to the development of weighted subject indexing systems that have direct applications for aiding users’ information seeking and improving knowledge organization in digital libraries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Taylor, A.G.: The organization of information, 3rd edn. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2008)
Lu, K., Mao, J.: Automatically infer subject terms and documents associations through text mining. In: Proceedings of ASIST 2013, pp. 1–3. Wiley, Montreal (2013)
Wilson, P.: Two kinds of power. An essay on bibliographic control. University of California Press, Berkeley (1968)
Maron, M.E.: On indexing, retrieval and the meaning of about. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28(1), 38–43 (1977)
Cooper, W.S., Maron, M.E.: Foundations of probabilistic and utility-theoretic indexing. Journal of the ACM 25(1), 67–80 (1978)
Kent, A., Lancour, H., Daily, J.E.: Probabilistic or weighted indexing. In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Volume 24 – Printers and Printing: Arabic Printing to Public Policy: Copyright, and Information Technology. CRC Press (1978)
Cleverdon, C.W.: The significance of the Cranfield tests on index languages. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGIR, pp. 3–12. ACM, New York (1991)
Zhang, H., Smith, L.C., Twidale, M., Gao, F.H.: Seeing the wood for the trees: Enhancing metadata subject elements with weights. Information Technology and Libraries 30(2), 75–80 (2011)
Hersh, W., Buckley, C., Leone, T.J., Hickam, D.: OHSUMED: an interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 1994, pp. 192–201. Springer London (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lu, K., Mao, J., Li, G. (2015). Enhancing Subject Metadata with Automated Weighting in the Medical Domain: A Comparison of Different Measures. In: Allen, R., Hunter, J., Zeng, M. (eds) Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. ICADL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9469. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27973-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27974-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)