Skip to main content

Effects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality on Visitor Experiences in Museum

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) on the overall visitor experience in the context of museum. In tourism research, few attempts have been made to examine factors which enhance visitor experience using new and emerging technologies such as VR & AR respectively, however research on visitor experience in the mixed environment by combining both VR & AR is scarce. In particular, this study examined the impact of social presence on visitor experience in the mixed (VR & AR) environment by applying social presence theory and experience economy theory. Questionnaires administered to 163 museum visitors revealed that social presence in mixed (VR & AR) environments is a strong predictor of four realms of experience economy. Furthermore, all aspects of experience economy, except for esthetic experience, have a significant influence on visitor experience, which consequently induce the tourists’ intention to revisit Geevor museum. The results of this study provide theoretical and managerial implications for adoption of VR & AR technologies in museum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. (2015). A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, online first: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, J. P., Pinto, M. M., & Beato, C. (2015). Virtual reality-shows a new vision for tourism and heritage. European Scientific Journal, 11(9), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag, D. A. (2010). Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management, 31(5), 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, D. I., Jung, T., & Gibson, A. (2013). Dublin AR: Implementing augmented reality in tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014 (pp. 511–523). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosany, S., & Witham, M. (2010). Dimensions of cruisers’ experiences, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 49(3), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, T., Chung, N., & Leue, M. C. (2015). The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Management, 49, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, S., Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2013). Augmented reality-based exhibit information personalized service architecture through spectator’s context analysis. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 8(4), 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M., & Gretzel, U. (2012). Effects of podcast tours on tourist experiences in a national park. Tourism Management, 33(2), 440–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keng, C. J., Huang, T. L., Zheng, L. J., & Hsu, M. K. (2007). Modeling service encounters and customer experiential value in retailing: An empirical investigation of shopping mall customers in Taiwan. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(4), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kounavis, C. D., Kasimati, A. E., & Zamani, E. D. (2012). Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4(10), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. M. (2002). Social responses to synthesized speech: Theory and application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Chung, N., & Jung, T. (2015). Examining the cultural differences in acceptance of mobile augmented reality: Comparison of South Korea and Ireland. In I. Tussyadiah & A. Inversini (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 477–491). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Chung, N., & Koo, C. (2015). Moderating effects of distrust and social influence on aesthetic experience of augmented reality: Motivation—Opportunity—Ability model perspective. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2015 (p. 22). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Lee, H. R., & Ham, S. (2013). The effects of presence induced by smartphone applications on tourism: Application to cultural heritage attractions. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2014 (pp. 59–72). Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leue, M. C., Jung, T., & tom Dieck, D. (2015). Google glass augmented reality: Generic learning outcomes for art galleries. In I. Tussyadiah & A. Inversini (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015 (pp. 463–476). Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, O. (2008). The secret lives of tourists: Delays, disappointments and daydreams. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 8(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marković, S. (2010). Aesthetic experience and the emotional content of paintings. Psihologija, 43(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marriott. (2014). #GetTeleported. Available at: http://news.marriott.com/2014/09/getteleported-the-most-immersive-4-d-virtual-travel-experience-arrives-taking-guests-to-parts-known-and-unknown-as-marri.html

  • Mehmetoglu, M., & Engen, M. (2011). Pine and Gilmore’s concept of experience economy and its dimensions: An empirical examination in tourism. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 12(4), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S., & Kahn, B. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, R., Litvak, S., & Yair, Y. (2001). 3D-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(3), 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., Elbe, J., & de Esteban Curiel, J. (2009). Has the experience economy arrived? The views of destination managers in three visitor-dependent areas. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(2), 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H., Fiore, A. M., & Jeoung, M. (2007). Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of Travel Research, 46(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuemie, M. J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijn, M., & Van Der Mast, C. A. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, E. (1997). The iconography of the tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 951–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J., Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 33–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2002). The tourist gaze. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Namho Chung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jung, T., tom Dieck, M.C., Lee, H., Chung, N. (2016). Effects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality on Visitor Experiences in Museum. In: Inversini, A., Schegg, R. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics