Skip to main content

Prediction and Planning Methods of Bipedal Dynamic Locomotion Over Very Rough Terrains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics Research

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics ((STAR,volume 100))

  • 4156 Accesses

Abstract

Although the problem of dynamic locomotion in very rough terrain is critical to the advancement of various areas in robotics and health devices, little progress has been made on generalizing gait behavior with arbitrary paths. Here, we report that perturbation theory, a set of approximation schemes that has roots in celestial mechanics and non-linear dynamical systems, can be adapted to predict the behavior of non closed-form integrable state-space trajectories of a robot’s center of mass, given its arbitrary contact state and center of mass (CoM) geometric path. Given an arbitrary geometric path of the CoM and known step locations, we use perturbation theory to determine phase curves of CoM behavior. We determine step transitions as the points of intersection between adjacent phase curves. To discover intersection points, we fit polynomials to the phase curves of neighboring steps and solve their differential roots. The resulting multi-step phase diagram is the locomotion plan suited to drive the behavior of a robot or device maneuvering in the rough terrain. We provide two main contributions to legged locomotion: (1) predicting CoM state-space behavior for arbitrary paths by means of numerical integration, and (2) finding step transitions by locating common intersection points between neighboring phase curves. Because these points are continuous in phase they correspond to the desired contact switching policy. We validate our results on a human-size avatar navigating in a very rough environment and compare its behavior to a human subject maneuvering through the same terrain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. K. Harada, S. Kajita, K. Kaneko, H. Hirukawa, Zmp analysis for arm/leg coordination, in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, USA, October 2003, pp. 75–81

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Kajita, M. Morisawa, K. Harada, K. Kaneko, F. Kanehiro, K. Fujiwara, H. Hirukawa, Biped walking pattern generator allowing auxiliary zmp control, in Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, October 2006, pp. 2993–2999

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Raibert, Legged Robots that Balance (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Bretl, S. Lall, Testing static equilibrium for legged robots. IEEE Trans. Rob. 24(4), 794–807 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Collette, A. Micaelli, C. Andriot, P. Lemerle, Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, USA, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Pratt, R. Tedrake, Velocity-based stability margins for fast bipedal walking, in Fast Motions in Biomechanics and Robotics, ed. by M. Diehl, K. Mombaur, vol. 340, pp. 299–324 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. McGeer, Passive dynamic walking. Int. J. Robot. Res. 9(2), 62–68 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Goswami, B. Espiau, A. Kermane, Limit cycles and their stability in a passive bipedal gait, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April 1996, pp. 246–251

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Mombaur, H. Bock, J. Schloder, R. Longman, Self-stabilizing somersaults. IEEE Trans. Robot. 21(6), 1148–1157 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Ruina, J. Bertram, M. Srinivasan, A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping, pseudo elastic leg behavior in running and the walk-to-run transition. J. Theor. Biol. 237, 170–192 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Takuma, K. Hosoda, Controlling the walking period of a pneumatic muscle walker. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25(9), 861–866 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Westervelt, J. Grizzle, C. Chevallereau, J. Choi, B. Morris, Feebdack Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion (CRC Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Stephens, C. Atkeson, Modeling and control of periodic humanoid balance using the linear biped model, in 9th IEEE RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2009. Humanoids 2009, December 2009, pp. 379–384

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Rummel, Y. Blum, A. Seyfarth, Robust and efficient walking with spring-like legs. Bioinspir. Biomimet. 5(4), 046004 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wisse, A. Schwab, R. van der Linde, F. van der Helm, How to keep from falling forward: elementary swing leg action for passive dynamic walkers. IEEE Trans. Robot. 21(3), 393–401 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Byl, R. Tedrake, Metastable walking machines. Int. J. Robot. Res. 28(8), 1040–1064 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I.R. Manchester, U. Mettin, F. Iida, R. Tedrake, Stable dynamic walking over uneven terrain. Int. J. Robot. Res. 30(3), 265–279 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Spong, J. Holm, D. Lee, Passivity-based control of bipedal locomotion. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(2), 30–40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Zucker, J. Bagnell, C. Atkeson, J. Kuffner, An optimization approach to rough terrain locomotion, in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2010, pp. 3589–3595

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Hauser, T. Bretl, K. Harada, J. Latombe, Using motion primitives in probabilistic sample-based planning for humanoid robots, in Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotic (WAFR), New York, USA, July 2006

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Bouyarmane, A. Kheddar, Multi-contact stances planning for multiple agents, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Sentis, B. Fernandez, Com state space cascading manifolds for planning dynamic locomotion in very rough terrain, in Proceedings of Dynamic Walking 2011, Jena, Germany, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Sentis, J. Park, O. Khatib, Compliant control of multi-contact and center of mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Trans. Rob. 26(3), 483–501 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Sentis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sentis, L., Fernandez, B.R., Slovich, M. (2017). Prediction and Planning Methods of Bipedal Dynamic Locomotion Over Very Rough Terrains. In: Christensen, H., Khatib, O. (eds) Robotics Research . Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29363-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29363-9_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29362-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29363-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics