Abstract
Creating a blended and open learning environment that supports self-directed learning is a desirable achievement. However, the difficulty of moving away from a guided, grade-based, exam-cramming teaching style has been shown to be demotivating for students and it is still unclear, how to design the on-boarding process well. We show that the current design of a course, despite being perceived as difficult, leads to mostly positive attitudes towards most aspects of the course across virtually all students. The success is a consequence of applying an evidence-based framework that takes into account two dimensions as guides in the design process: incorporating gamification factors and creating room for learner types. The paper describes how the framework is used during design decisions. Comparing the analysis for individual forum use and peer-reviews on team blogs elucidates why the former is perceived less favorably than the latter and provides insight into potential improvements.
K. Berkling—The author wishes to thank the students who have helped shape this course over the years starting in Puerto Rico.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bjork, R.A., Dunlosky, J., Kornell, N.: Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 417–444 (2013)
Berkling, K., Thomas, C.: Gamification of a software engineering course-and a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to it’s failure. Submitted to ICL 2013. In: 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), vol. 42, pp. 525–530 (2013)
Thomas, C., Berkling, K.: Redesign of a gamified software engineering course. In: 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 778–786 (2013)
Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., Koller, D.: Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs (2013). arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2579
Nilson, L.B.: Helping students help each other: making peer feedback more valuable. Essays Teach. Excellence 14, 1–2 (2002)
Thomas, H.: Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis ‘placement’ of learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41, 502–511 (2010)
Aydin, S.: A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 60, 1093–1106 (2012)
Tinmaz, H.: Social networking websites as an innovative framework for connectivism. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 3, 234–245 (2012)
Pujo, F.A., Sánchez, J.L., GarcÃa, J., Mora, H., Jimeno, A.: Blogs: a learning tool proposal for an audiovisual engineering course. In: 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 871–874 (2011)
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., Seaton, D.T.: Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edX’s first MOOC. Res. Pract. Assess. 8, 13–25 (2013)
Manning, J.: How widely used are MOOC forums? A first look (2013)
Bruff, D.: Lessons learned from Vanderbilt’s first MOOCs (2013)
Berkling, K.: Connecting peer reviews with student motivation - onboarding, motivation and blended learning. In: 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) (2015)
Berkling, K., Zundel, A.: Understanding the challenges of introducing self-driven blended learning in a restrictive ecosystem-step 1 for change management: understanding student motivation. In: 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), pp. 311–320 (2013)
Berkling, K., Thomas, C.: Looking for usage patterns in e-learning platforms - a step towards adaptive environments. In: 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) (2014)
Pink, D.H.: Summaries, soundview executive book: the surprising truth about what motivates us. Soundview executive book summaries (2010)
Kim, A.J.: Smart gamification: designing the player journey, 16 February 2011
Tagg, J.: The Learning Paradigm College. Anker Publishing Company, Bolton (2003)
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000)
Gagné, M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26, 331–362 (2005)
Maslow, A.H.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370 (1943)
Santo, S.A.: Relationships between learning styles and online learning. Perform. Improv. Q. 19, 73–88 (2006)
Grasha, A.F.: A matter of style: the teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. Coll. Teach. 42, 142–149 (1994)
Fuhrmann, B.S., Grasha, A.F.: A Practical Handbook for College Teachers. Little Brown & Co., Boston (1983)
Heikaus, O., Flasdick, J.: Kompetent und praxisnah - Erwartungen der Wirtschaft an Hochschulabsolventen (2015)
Heidenreich, K.: Erwartungen der Wirtschaft an Hochschulabsolventen (2011)
Goel, S., Sharda, N.: What Do Engineers Want? Examining Engineering Education through Bloom’s Taxonomy, Online Submission (2004)
Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7, 95–105 (2004)
Hall, S.R., Waitz, I., Brodeu, D.R., Soderholm, D.H., Nasr, R.: Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. In: 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 1, pp. T2A–9. FIE 2002 (2002)
Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 9th edn. Pearson, Boston (2011)
Schumann, S.: Repräsentative Umfrage: praxisorientierte Einführung in empirische Methoden und statistische Analyseverfahren. Oldenbourg Verlag (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Table 9 lists all items of the questionnaire used to evaluate the onboarding process for Software Engineering based on principles of gamification with blended learning.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Berkling, K. (2016). Gamification Behind the Scenes. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29584-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29585-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)