Skip to main content

Modeling User Interests for Zero-Query Ranking

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9626))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Proactive search systems like Google Now and Microsoft Cortana have gained increasing popularity with the growth of mobile Internet. Unlike traditional reactive search systems where search engines return results in response to queries issued by the users, proactive systems actively push information cards to the users on mobile devices based on the context around time, location, environment (e.g., weather), and user interests. A proactive system is a zero-query information retrieval system, which makes user modeling critical for understanding user information needs. In this paper, we study user modeling in proactive search systems and propose a learning to rank method for proactive ranking. We explore a variety of ways of modeling user interests, ranging from direct modeling of historical interaction with content types to finer-grained entity-level modeling, and user demographical information. To reduce the feature sparsity problem in entity modeling, we propose semantic similarity features using word embedding and an entity taxonomy in knowledge base. Experiments performed with data from a large commercial proactive search system show that our method significantly outperforms a strong baseline method deployed in the production system.

L. Yang—Work primarily done when interning at Microsoft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S.: Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: SIGIR 2006, pp. 19–26. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan, J., Croft, B., Moffat, A., Sanderson, M.: Frontiers, challenges, and opportunities for information retrieval: Report from SWIRL 2012 the second strategic workshop on information retrieval in lorne. SIGIR Forum 46(1), 2–32 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, P.N., Radlinski, F., White, R., Yilmaz, E.: Inferring and using location metadata to personalize web search. In: SIGIR 2011, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, P.N., White, R.W., Chu, W., Dumais, S.T., Bailey, P., Borisyuk, F., Cui, X.: Modeling the impact of short- and long-term behavior on search personalization. In: SIGIR 2012, pp. 185–194. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burges, C., Ragno, R., Le, Q.: Learning to rank with non-smooth cost functions. In: NIPS 2007. MIT Press, Cambridge, January 2007

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., White, T.: Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 23(2), 147–168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, Q., Jin, H., Lagun, D., Yuan, S., Agichtein, E.: Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance. In: SIGIR 2013, pp. 153–162 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lagun, D., Hsieh, C.-H., Webster, D., Navalpakkam, V.: Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search. In: SIGIR 2014, pp. 113–122. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, J., Huffman, S., Tokuda, A.: Good abandonment in mobile and PC internet search. In: SIGIR 2009, pp. 43–50. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, T., Mausam, Etzioni, O.: No noun phrase left behind: Detecting and typing unlinkable entities. In: EMNLP-CoNLL 2012, pp. 893–903. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint (2013). arxiv:1301.3781

  12. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS 2013, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender systems. Commun. ACM 40(3), 56–58 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhodes, B.J., Maes, P.: Just-in-time information retrieval agents. IBM Syst. J. 39(3–4), 685–704 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shokouhi, M., Guo, Q.: From queries to cards: Re-ranking proactive card recommendations based on reactive search history. In: SIGIR 2015, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  16. Song, F., Croft, W.B.: A general language model for information retrieval. In: CIKM 1999, pp. 316–321. ACM, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Su, X., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv in Artif Intell 2009, 4:2–4:2 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, L., Bennett, P.N., Collins-Thompson, K.: Robust ranking models via risk-sensitive optimization. In: SIGIR 2012, pp. 761–770. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. White, R.W., Chu, W., Hassan, A., He, X., Song, Y., Wang, H.: Enhancing personalized search by mining and modeling task behavior. In: WWW 2013, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1411–1420 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, Q., Burges, C.J., Svore, K.M., Gao, J.: Adapting boosting for information retrieval measures. Inf. Retr. 13(3), 254–270 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, S., Jiang, H., Lau, F.C.-M.: Mining user dwell time for personalized web search re-ranking. In: IJCAI 2011, pp. 2367–2372 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was done during Liu Yang’s internship at Microsoft Research and Bing. It was supported in part by the Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval and in part by NSF grant #IIS-1419693. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsor. We thank Jing Jiang and Jiepu Jiang for their valuable and constructive comments on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, L. et al. (2016). Modeling User Interests for Zero-Query Ranking. In: Ferro, N., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30670-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30671-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics