Skip to main content

Captology and Technology Appropriation: Unintended Use as a Source for Designing Persuasive Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9638))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we theoretically reflect upon persuasive technology usage under the light of technology appropriation. The intended usage of technology often fails, meaning that the designers’ intended use is not always translated into user behavior. This is also true for persuasive technology, since technology will always be used within a context involving users’ own intentions that may not always be anticipated by designers. This clashes with Fogg’s framing of captology, which explicitly focuses on endogenous intent, i.e., a persuasive intent that is designed into a technology. With this paper we open up an initial theoretical discourse around these two concepts, highlighting how the design of persuasive technologies can be informed by existing knowledge around technology appropriation. This is done by reflecting upon three identified ‘action points’: (1) learning from appropriation, (2) designing for appropriation, and (3) designing for personal differences and ambiguity of interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. In: Proceedings of the CHI, pp. 225–232. ACM (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do‬. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, B.M.: Captology: A critical review. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, R.R.: Book reviews: Persuasive technology. JBTC, J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 7, 251–254 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berdichewsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Toward an ethics of persuasive technology’. Commun. ACM 42(5), 51–58 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verbeek, P-P.: Persuasive Technology and Moral Responsibility: Toward an ethical framework for persuasive technologies. In: Proceedings of PERSUASIVE 2006, Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ihde, D.: Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dix, A.: Designing for appropriation. In: Proceedings of the BCS-HCI 2007. UK, pp. 27–30 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carroll, J.: Completing design in use: Closing the appropriation cycle. In: Proceedings of the ECIS 2004, Turku, Finland, 11 p. Paper 44 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dourish, P.: The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. JCSCW 12(4), 465–490 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Interaction design basics, 3rd edn. Human Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Klemmer, S.R., Hartmann, B., Takayama, L.: How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In: Proceedings of the DIS 2006, pp. 140–149. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henderson, A., Kyng, M.: There’s no place like home: Continuing design in use, pp. 219–240. Lawrence Erlbaum, USA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, J.C.: Continuous design and redesign. Des. Stud. 4(1), 53–60 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehn, P.: Participation in design things. In: Proceedings of the Participatory Design 2008, pp. 92–101 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bijker, W.E., Pinch, T.J.: The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit of Each Other. MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bødker, S., Christiansen, E.: Poetry in motion: Appropriation of the world of apps. In: Proceedings of the ECCE 2012, pp. 78–84. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy and the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development is gratefully acknowledged (Christian Doppler Laboratory for Contextual Interfaces).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Krischkowsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krischkowsky, A., Maurer, B., Tscheligi, M. (2016). Captology and Technology Appropriation: Unintended Use as a Source for Designing Persuasive Technologies. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., De Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9638. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31509-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31510-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics