Abstract
The paper makes some historical remarks about compositionality, the role it played in the foundations of Dependence Logic, and more broadly how the idea of compositionality has developed over the last millennium. There are also some brief remarks explaining why, in the author’s view, the idea of compositionality is unlikely to be helpful for putting the subtle non-uniform-definability results of Galliani and Yang into a broader context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blok, W., Pigozzi, D.: Protoalgebraic logics. Stud. Logica 45, 337–369 (1986)
Caicedo, X., Dechesne, F., Janssen, T.M.V.: Equivalence and quantifier rules for logic with imperfect information. Log. J. IGPL 17, 91–129 (2009)
Chiswell, I., Hodges, W.: Mathematical Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Galliani, P.: Epistemic operators and uniform definability in dependence logic. Stud. Logica 101, 367–397 (2013)
Giolfo, M.E.B., Hodges, W.: Syntax and meaning in Sı̄rāfı̄ and Ibn Sı̄nā. Romano-Arabica xiii, 81–97 (2013)
Hintikka, J., Sandu, G.: Informational independence as a semantical phenomenon. In: Fenstad, D.E., et al. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VIII, pp. 571–589. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989)
Hintikka, J., Sandu, G.: Game-theoretical semantics. In: Van Benthem, J., Ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 361–410. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)
Hodges, W.: Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information. Log. J. IGPL 5, 539–563 (1997)
Hodges, W.: Formalizing the relationship between meaning and syntax. In: Werning, M., Hinzen, W., Machery, E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, pp. 245–261. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Ishiguro, H.: Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Katz, J., Fodor, J.: The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39, 170–210 (1963)
Lappin, S., Zadrozny, W.: Compositionality, synonymy, and the systematic representation of meaning (January 9, 2000). https://archive.org/details/arxiv-cs0001006 cited 25 Feb 2014
Lenz, M.: Are thoughts and sentences compositional? A controversy between Abelard and a pupil of Alberic on the reconciliation of ancient theses on mind and language. In: Marenbon, J. (ed.) The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions, pp. 39–58. Brill, Leiden (2007)
Partee, B.: Montague’s “linguistic” work: motivations, trajectory, attitudes. http://semanticsarchive.net/sub2012/Partee.pdf (2016). Cited 17 April 2016
Partee, B., Ter Meulen, A., Wall, R.: Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)
Peters, S., Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2006)
Putnam, H.: Do true assertions correspond to reality? In: Putnam, H. (ed.) Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 70–84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975). (original 1960)
Rosetta, M.T.: Compositional Translation. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)
Rosier-Catach, I.: La notion de translation, le principe de compositionalité et l’analyse de la prédication accidentelle chez Abélard. In: Biard, J. (ed.) Langage, Sciences, Philosophie au XIIIe Siècle, pp. 125–164. Vrin, Paris (1999)
Yang, F.: Uniform definability of connectives in PD. Preprint
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hodges, W. (2016). Remarks on Compositionality. In: Abramsky, S., Kontinen, J., Väänänen, J., Vollmer, H. (eds) Dependence Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31803-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31803-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31801-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31803-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)