Skip to main content

Remarks on Compositionality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dependence Logic

Abstract

The paper makes some historical remarks about compositionality, the role it played in the foundations of Dependence Logic, and more broadly how the idea of compositionality has developed over the last millennium. There are also some brief remarks explaining why, in the author’s view, the idea of compositionality is unlikely to be helpful for putting the subtle non-uniform-definability results of Galliani and Yang into a broader context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blok, W., Pigozzi, D.: Protoalgebraic logics. Stud. Logica 45, 337–369 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Caicedo, X., Dechesne, F., Janssen, T.M.V.: Equivalence and quantifier rules for logic with imperfect information. Log. J. IGPL 17, 91–129 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiswell, I., Hodges, W.: Mathematical Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Galliani, P.: Epistemic operators and uniform definability in dependence logic. Stud. Logica 101, 367–397 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Giolfo, M.E.B., Hodges, W.: Syntax and meaning in Sı̄rāfı̄ and Ibn Sı̄nā. Romano-Arabica xiii, 81–97 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hintikka, J., Sandu, G.: Informational independence as a semantical phenomenon. In: Fenstad, D.E., et al. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VIII, pp. 571–589. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hintikka, J., Sandu, G.: Game-theoretical semantics. In: Van Benthem, J., Ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 361–410. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodges, W.: Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information. Log. J. IGPL 5, 539–563 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodges, W.: Formalizing the relationship between meaning and syntax. In: Werning, M., Hinzen, W., Machery, E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, pp. 245–261. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ishiguro, H.: Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katz, J., Fodor, J.: The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39, 170–210 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lappin, S., Zadrozny, W.: Compositionality, synonymy, and the systematic representation of meaning (January 9, 2000). https://archive.org/details/arxiv-cs0001006 cited 25 Feb 2014

  13. Lenz, M.: Are thoughts and sentences compositional? A controversy between Abelard and a pupil of Alberic on the reconciliation of ancient theses on mind and language. In: Marenbon, J. (ed.) The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions, pp. 39–58. Brill, Leiden (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Partee, B.: Montague’s “linguistic” work: motivations, trajectory, attitudes. http://semanticsarchive.net/sub2012/Partee.pdf (2016). Cited 17 April 2016

  15. Partee, B., Ter Meulen, A., Wall, R.: Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Peters, S., Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam, H.: Do true assertions correspond to reality? In: Putnam, H. (ed.) Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 70–84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975). (original 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosetta, M.T.: Compositional Translation. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosier-Catach, I.: La notion de translation, le principe de compositionalité et l’analyse de la prédication accidentelle chez Abélard. In: Biard, J. (ed.) Langage, Sciences, Philosophie au XIIIe Siècle, pp. 125–164. Vrin, Paris (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, F.: Uniform definability of connectives in PD. Preprint

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilfrid Hodges .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hodges, W. (2016). Remarks on Compositionality. In: Abramsky, S., Kontinen, J., Väänänen, J., Vollmer, H. (eds) Dependence Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31803-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics