Skip to main content

Naval Intelligent Authentication and Support Through Randomization and Transformative Search

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Approaches in Intelligent Control

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 107))

Abstract

The problem addressed, in this chapter, pertains to how to represent and apply knowledge to best facilitate its extension and use in problem solving. Unlike deductive logics (e.g., the predicate calculus), an inherent degree of error is allowed for so as to greatly enlarge the inferential space. This allowance, in turn, implies the application of heuristics (e.g., multiple analogies) to problem solving as well as their indirect use in inferring the heuristics themselves. This chapter is motivated by the science of inductive inference. Examples of state-space search, linguistic applications, and a focus methodology for generating novel knowledge (components) for wartime engagement for countering (cyber) threats (WAMS) are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feigenbaum, E.A., McCorduck, P.: The Fifth Generation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stilwell, A.: SAS and Elite Forces Guide Special Forces in Action. Lyons Press, Guilford, CN (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shi, L-X., Peng, W-L., Zhang, W-N.: Research on reusable design information of shoes based on CBR. In: 2012 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials Science. Physics Procedia—Elsevier, vol. 25 pp. 2089–2095 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fan, Z-P., Li, Y-H., Wang, X., Liu, Y.: Hybrid similarity measure for case retrieval in CBR and its application to emergency response towards gas explosion. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 2526–2534 (2014) (Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khanuma, A., Muftib, M., Javeda, M.Y., Shafiqa, M.Z.: Fuzzy case-based reasoning for facial expression recognition. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160, 231–250 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sampaio, L.N., Tedesco, P.C.A.R., Monteiro, J.A.S., Cunha, P.R.F.: A knowledge and collaboration-based CBR process to improve network performance-related support activities. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 5466–5482 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lao, S.I., Choy, K.L., Ho, G.T.S., Yam, R.C.M., Tsim, Y.C., Poon, T.C.: Achieving quality assurance functionality in the food industry using a hybrid case-based reasoning and fuzzy logic approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 5251–5261 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar, Y.J., Salim, N., Abuobieda, A., Albaham, A.T.: Multi document summarization based on news components using fuzzy cross-document relations. Appl. Soft Comput. 21, 265–279 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin, S.H.: Case-based generalization (CBG) for increasing the applicability and ease of access to case-based knowledge for predicting COAs. NC No. 101366 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin, S.H.: Multilevel constraint-based randomization adapting case-based learning to fuse sensor data for autonomous predictive analysis. NC 101614 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chaitin, G.J.: Randomness and mathematical proof. Sci. Am. 232(5), 47–52 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin, S.H.: On randomization and discovery. Inform. Sci. 177(1), 170–191 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Solomonoff, R.: A new method for discovering the grammars of phrase structure languages. In: Proceedings of International Conference Information Processing, pp. 285–290. UNESCO Publishing House, Paris, France (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Solomonoff, R.: A formal theory of inductive inference. Inform. Contr. 7, 1–22 and 224–254 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Honavar, V., Slutzki, G. (eds.): Grammatical inference. In: Proceedings of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1433. Springer, Berlin, Germany (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fu, K.S.: Syntactic Pattern Recognition and Applications. Prentice-Hall Advances in Computing Science and Technology Series, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uspenskii, V.A.: Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem. Ves Mir Publishers, Russian, Moscow (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin, S.H.: Computing with words. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 29(4), 518–524 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bouabana-Tebibel, T., Rubin, S.H. (eds.): Integration of Reusable Systems. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsson, N.J.: Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Tioga Pub. Co., Palo Alto, CA (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. The U.S. Army Field Manual No. 3–24: Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual No. 3–33.5. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bilinski, M.: Compiler Techniques as a Defense Against Cyber Attacks. Machine Learning Series, SSC-PAC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deitel, H.M.: An Introduction to Operating Systems. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubin, S.H., Lee, G., Chen, S.C.: A Case-Based Reasoning Decision Support System for Fleet Maintenance. Naval Engineers J., NEJ-2009-05-STP-0239. R1, 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rubin, S.H.: Multi-Level Segmented Case-Based Learning Systems for Multi-Sensor Fusion. NC No. 101451 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Minton, S.: Learning Search Control Knowledge: An Explanation Based Approach, vol. 61. Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rubin, S.H.: Is the kolmogorov complexity of computational intelligence bounded above? In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), pp. 455–461. Las Vegas, NV (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart H. Rubin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix I: The 3-2-1 Skew

The 3-2-1 skew is a simple (fast) methodology for assigning knowledge relative weights on the basis of Denning’s principle of temporal locality [23]. More recent knowledge tends to be proportionately more valuable. This skew is used to increase the likelihood of solving a problem by taking full advantage of the current operational domain profile (Fig. 3.3).

Fig. 3.3
figure 3

The 3-2-1 skew for dynamic selection in a case-base segment

Knowledge is acquired at the logical head and moved there when fired. It is also expunged from the logical tail when necessary to release space. The selection of a particular skew is domain specific. For example, the rate of radioactive decay is known to be proportional to how much radioactive material is left (excluding the presence of certain metals). The nuclear decay equation may be used as a skew for various radioactive materials and is given by \(A(t) = A_{0} e^{ - \lambda t}\). Here, A(t) is the quantity of radioactive material at time t, and A0 = A(0) is the initial quantity. \(\lambda\) (lambda) is a positive number (i.e., the decay constant) defining the rate of decay for the particular radioactive material. A countably infinite number of other skews may be applicable.

In the following assignment of skew-weights, the skew vector, S, favors the logical head of the case base in keeping with temporal locality. Cases, which were most-recently acquired or fired, and thus appear at or nearer to the logical head of a case-base, are proportionately more heavily weighted under the 3-2-1 skew. Of course, this differs from a uniform skew. The closer a case is to the top of its linked list, the greater its weight or importance. A heuristic scheme (i.e., the 3-2-1 skew) for achieving this with a dependency category consisting of d rules is to assign the head case a weight of \(\frac{2d}{d(d + 1)}\). The map just below the head map has a weight of \(\frac{2(d - 1)}{d(d + 1)}\).

Finally, the tail map of the segmented case base has a weight of \(\frac{2}{d(d + 1)}\). The ith map from the head has a weight of \(\frac{2(d - i + 1)}{d(d + 1)}\), for i = 1, 2, …, d. For example, using a vector of four weights, the 3-2-1 skew (S) is S = (0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1)T. There are a countably infinite number of possible skews, such that \(\sum {s_{k} } = 1.0\).

The evaluation of the members of a dependency category is the contiguous weighted sum of its constituent elements. A 3-2-1 skew is defined where the ith map from the head has a weight of \(\frac{2(d - i + 1)}{d(d + 1)}\), for i = 1, 2, …, d; where, d specifies the number of terms in the skew. The use of the 3-2-1 skew is optional (i.e., in comparison with uniform weighting) and is useful for domains where the value of the data deteriorates in linear proportion to its time of collection—valuing more recent data, more highly [27]. The use of additional time-dependent weights, depending on whether there is an additional time dependency of the value of the knowledge, is also possible.

Appendix II: Performer Capabilities

Stuart H. Rubin, PI, received a Ph.D. in Computer and Information Science from Lehigh University in 1988. He was previously an ONT Post-Doctoral Fellow, at NOSC, for 3 years and a tenured associate professor of computer science at Central Michigan University. He has over 30 Assigned Navy Patents, over 287 Refereed Publications, and received SSC-PAC’s Publication of the Year Awards in 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011. He is a SIRI Fellow and serves in leadership roles in numerous IEEE technical societies.

Thouraya Bouabana Tebibel received a Ph.D. in Computer Science from USTHB University (Algeria) in collaboration with Pierre & Marie Curie University (France) in 2007. She has been an engineer/researcher for eight years and is now a full professor of computer science at Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Informatique in Algeria. She has over 80 refereed publications and a book edited by Editions Universitaires Européennes. She has successfully conducted numerous research projects and supervised 30 BS, 17 MS, and 4 Ph.D. theses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rubin, S.H., Bouabana-Tebibel, T. (2016). Naval Intelligent Authentication and Support Through Randomization and Transformative Search. In: Nakamatsu, K., Kountchev, R. (eds) New Approaches in Intelligent Control. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32168-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32168-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32166-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32168-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics