Skip to main content

Rough Sets in Multicriteria Classification of National Heritage Monuments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. Advanced Technologies for Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (BDAS 2015, BDAS 2016)

Abstract

The motivation of this paper are problems how to improve assessment of historic buildings, in terms of the significance of conservation activities. The protection of national heritage, so important nowadays, requires a multicriteria assessment. Seeing that different factors in varying degrees affect the comprehensive assessment of the object, it becomes necessary to use computational intelligence methods. This paper presents a rough sets approach to multicriteria rating of objects on the example of historical buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Czajkowski, K., Bobowski, K.: Data anlysis using rough sets in the protection of architectural monuments. Stud. Informatica 32, 299–313 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Czajkowski, K., Drabowski, M.: Semantic data selections and mining in decision tables. In: Czachórski, T., Kozielski, S., Stańczyk, U. (eds.) Man-Machine Interactions 2. AISC, vol. 103, pp. 279–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Czajkowski, K., Olczyk, P.: Fuzzy interface for historical monuments databases. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B. (eds.) BDAS 2014. CCIS, vol. 424, pp. 271–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., Mondini, G.: Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the multi-attribute value theory for the reuse of historical buildings. J. Cult. Heritage 15, 644–655 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giove, S., Rosato, P., Breil, M.: An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The redevelopment of venice arsenale. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 17, 85–99 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowinski, R.: A new rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk. In: Zopounidis, C. (ed.) Operational Tools in the Management of Financial Risks, pp. 121–136. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129(1), 1–47 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu, X., Lin, T., Han, J.: A new rough sets model based on database systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 59(2–3), 135–152 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazzanti, M.: Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation. J. Socio-Econ. 31, 529–558 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Heritage Board of Poland: List of immovable monuments entered into the monuments register http://www.nid.pl/en/ (2015). Accessed 30 Oct 2015

  11. Pawlak, Z.: Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99, 48–57 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlicki, B.M.: Differences in the theory and practice of the preservation of monuments and the protection of cultural heritage sites. Tech. Trans. 112(6–A), 141–154 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pawlicki, B.M., Drabowski, M., Czajkowski, K.: Monitoring stanu zachowania obiektow zabytkowych przy wykorzystaniu wspolczesnych systemow informatycznych. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej, Krakow (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Provincial Heritage Monuments Protection Office: The register of immovable monuments of Cracow http://www.wuoz.malopolska.pl/ (2015). Accessed 16 Nov 2015

  16. Szmygin, B.: System ochrony zabytkw w Polsce analiza, diagnoza, propozycje. Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin Warszawa (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Szmygin, B.: Transformation of the heritage protection system in Poland after 1989. In: Purchla, J. (ed.) Protecting and Safeguarding Cultural Heritage. Systems of Management of Cultural Heritage in the Visegrad Countries, pp. 31–38. International Cultural Centre, Krakow (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Szmygin, B.: Theory and criteria of heritage evaluation as the basis for its protection. Wiadomosci Konserwatorskie 44, 44–52 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, H., Zeng, Z.: A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 1241–1249 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yildirim, M.: Assessment of the decision-making process for reuse of a historical asset: the example of diyarbakir hasan pasha khan. J. Cult. Heritage 13, 379–388 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Czajkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Czajkowski, K. (2016). Rough Sets in Multicriteria Classification of National Heritage Monuments. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds) Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. Advanced Technologies for Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. BDAS BDAS 2015 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34099-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34099-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34098-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34099-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics