Skip to main content

Abstract

In this paper we present an in depth discussion of the architecture of a new plagiarism detection platform developed by a consortium of Polish universities. The algorithms used by the platform are briefly described in Sect. 3. The main goal of this paper is to present high level structures of services resulting from a very nontrivial attempt to strike an appropriate balance between locality and centralization, while working under strict constraint, both of technological and legal nature.

This work is supported by MUCI (Międzyuniwersyteckie Centrum Informatyzacji — Interuniversity Centre for IT).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aragon, A.M.: A C++11 implementation of arbitrary-rank tensors for high-performance computing. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185(11), 3065–3066 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Devi, S.L., Rao, P.R., Ram, V.S., Akilandeswari, A.: External plagiarism detection. Lab report for PAN at CLEF (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., Leung, S.T.: The Google file system. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP 2003, pp. 29–43. ACM, New York (2003). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/945445.945450

  4. Gipp, B., Beel, J.: Citation based plagiarism detection: a new approach to identify plagiarized work language independently. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 273–274. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoad, T.C., Zobel, J.: Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(3), 203–215 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Juola, P.: Authorship attribution. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 1(3), 233–334 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalski, M.: Imitacja i ignorancja. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej 15, 69–74 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kowalski, M., Kruszyński, P., Sobieski, S., Sysak, M.: Geneza, architekturai testy otwartego systemu antyplagiatowego. In: Hołyst, B., Pomykała, J., Potejko, P. (eds.) Nowe techniki badań kryminalistycznych a bezpieczeństwo informacji, pp. 257–273. PWN (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kowalski, M., Szczepański, M.: Identity of academic theses. In: Dobrzynska T., Kuncheva R. (eds.) Resemblance and Difference. The Problem of Identity, pp. 259-278. IBL PAN, IL BAN (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalski, M., Szczepański, M.: Akademicka przestępczość wcyberprzestrzeni. In: Hołyst, B., Pomykała, J. (eds.) Cyberprzestępczość i ochrona informacji, pp. 113–126. WydawnictwoWyższej Szkoły Menedżerskiej w Warszawie (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Łysoń, P., Golaszewska, H., Maślankowski, J., Franecka, A., Jaworski, P., Kamińska, M., Rutkowska, M., Rybicka, K., Ulatowska, M., Wiktor, M.: Szkoły wyższe i ich finanse w 2012 r. Higher education institutions and their finances in 2012. In: Informacje i opracowania statystyczne, Statistical Information and Elaborations. Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meuschke, N., Gipp, B.: State-of-the-art in detecting academic plagiarism. Int. J. for Educ. Integrity 9(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Monostori, K., Zaslavsky, A., Schmidt, H.: Identifying overlapping documents in semi-structured text collections. In: Australasian Computer Science Conference (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pagh, R., Rodler, F.F.: Cuckoo hashing. J. Algorithms 51(2), 122–144 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgor.2003.12.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rocchio, J.J.: Relevance feedback in information retrieval (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salton, G.: Developments in automatic text retrieval. Science (New York, N.Y.) 253(5023), 974–980 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5023.974

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 24(5), 513–523 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/361219.361220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schleimer, S., Wilkerson, D.S., Aiken, A.: Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 76–85. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Si, A., Leong, H.V., Lau, R.W.: Check: a document plagiarism detection system. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 70–77. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sindhu, L., Thomas, B.B., Idicula, S.M.: Automated plagiarism detection system for malayalam text documents. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 106(15), 13–16 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Szczepański, M.: Testy skuteczności algorytmu preselekcji otwartego systemu antyplagiatowego In: Holyst, B., Pomykala, J., Potejko, P. (eds.) Nowe techniki badan kryminalistycznych a bezpieczenstwo informacji, pp. 248–256. PWN (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Szczepański, M.: Algorytmy klasyfikacji tekstów i ich wykorzystanie w systemie wykrywania plagiatów. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szmit, R.: Fast plagiarism detection in large-scale data (submitted for publicaton)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, H., Salton, G.: A comparison of search term weighting: term relevance vs.inverse document frequency. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Information Storage and Retrieval: Theoretical Issues in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1981, pp. 30–39. ACM, New York (1981). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/511754.511759

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek A. Kowalski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sobieski, Ś., Kowalski, M.A., Kruszyński, P., Sysak, M., Zieliński, B., Maślanka, P. (2016). OSA Architecture. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds) Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. Advanced Technologies for Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. BDAS BDAS 2015 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34099-9_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34099-9_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34098-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34099-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics