Skip to main content

Portfolio of Global Futures Algorithmic Trading Strategies for Best Out-of-Sample Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 255))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate two different portfolio construction methods for two different sets of algorithmic trading strategies that trade global futures. The problem becomes complex if we consider the out-of-sample performance. The Comgen method blindly optimizes the Sharpe ratio, and Comsha does the same but gives priority to strategies that individually have the better Sharpe ratio. It has been shown in the past that high Sharpe ratio strategies tend to perform better in out-of-sample periods. As the benchmark method, we use an equally weighted (1/N, naïve) portfolio. The analysis is performed on two years of out-of-sample data using a walk forward approach in 24 independent periods. We use the mean reversion and trend following datasets consisting of 22,702 and 36,466 trading models (time series), respectively. We conclude that Comsha produces better results with trend-following methods, and Comsha performs the same as Comgen with other type of strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Narang, R.K.: Inside the Black Box: A Simple Guide to Quantitative and High Frequency Trading. Wiley, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finan. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Raudys, S., Raudys, A., Pabarskaite, Z.: Sustainable economy inspired large-scale feed-forward portfolio construction. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20(1), 79–96 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McNelis, P.D.: Neural Networks in Finance: Gaining Predictive Edge in the Market. Academic Press, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ustun, O., Kasimbeyli, R.: Combined forecasts in portfolio optimization: a generalized approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(4), 805–819 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto, R., Ishibashi, T., Konno, H.: Portfolio optimization under transfer coefficient constraint. J. Asset Manag. 13(1), 51–57 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharpe, W.F.: Mutual fund performance. J. Bus. 39(1), 119–138 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hung, K., Cheung, Y., Xu, L.: An extended ASLD trading system to enhance portfolio management. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14(2), 413–425 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freitas, F.D., De Souza, A.F., de Almeida, A.R.: Prediction-based portfolio optimization model using neural networks. Neurocomputing 72(10–12), 2155–2170 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, J., Qiu, G., Cao, X.: Application of genetic algorithm based on dual mutation in the optimal portfolio selection. J. Nanchang Hangkong Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 4, 006 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jivendra, K.: Portfolio optimization using the quadratic optimization system and publicly available information on the WWW. Manag. Finan. 35(5), 439–450 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M., de Prado, M.L., Zhu, Q.J.: Pseudomathematics and financial charlatanism: the effects of backtest over fitting on out-of-sample performance. Not. AMS 61(5), 458–471 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein, M., Branke, J., Schmeck, H.: Efficient implementation of an active set algorithm for large-scale portfolio selection. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(12), 3945–3961 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Raudys, A., Pabarskaite, Z.: Discrete portfolio optimisation for large scale systematic trading applications. In: 2012 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI). IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raudys, S., Raudys, A.: High frequency trading portfolio optimisation: integration of financial and human factors. In: 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA). IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haley, M.R.: Shortfall minimization and the Naive (1/N) portfolio: an out-of-sample comparison. Appl. Econ. Lett. 1–4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Prado, M.L.: Recent trends in empirical finance. J. Portfolio Manag. 42(1), 29–33 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan, E.: Algorithmic Trading: Winning Strategies and Their Rationale. Wiley, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania under the grant MIP-100/2015. Authors also want to express their appreciation to Vilnius University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aistis Raudys .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raudys, A. (2016). Portfolio of Global Futures Algorithmic Trading Strategies for Best Out-of-Sample Performance. In: Abramowicz, W., Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39426-8_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics