Abstract
Past studies have shown that Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) can predict student performance and implement Cognitive Mastery successfully. Standard BKT individualizes parameter estimates for skills, also referred to as knowledge components (KCs), but not for students. Studies deriving individual student parameters from the data logs of student tutor performance have shown improvements to the standard BKT model fits, and result in different practice recommendations for students. This study investigates whether individual student parameters, specifically individual difference weights (IDWs) [1], can be derived from student activities prior to tutor use. We find that student performance measures in reading instructional text and in a conceptual knowledge pretest can be employed to predict IDWs. Further, we find that a model incorporating these predicted IDWs performs well, in terms of model fit and learning efficiency, when compared to a standard BKT model and a model with best-fitting IDWs derived from tutor performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 4, 253–278 (1995)
Mayo, M., Mitrovic, A.: Optimising ITS behaviour with Bayesian networks and decision theory. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 12, 124–153 (2001)
Shute, V.: Smart: student modeling approach for responsive tutoring. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 5(1), 1–44 (1995)
Ganeshan, R., Johnson, W.L., Shaw, E., Wood, B.P.: Tutoring diagnostic problem solving. In: Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., VanLehn, K. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 33–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K.: Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 12, 371–417 (2002)
Corbett, A.T., MacLaren, B., Kauffman, L., Wagner, A., Jones, E.A.: Cognitive tutor for genetics problem solving: learning gains and student modeling. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 42(2), 219–239 (2010)
Gong, Y., Beck, J., Heffernan, N.: Comparing knowledge tracing and performance factor analysis by using multiple model fitting procedures. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 35–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Koedinger, K., Corbett, A., Perfetti, C.: The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36(5), 757–798 (2012)
Lee, J., Brunskill, E.: The impact of individualizing student models on necessary practice opportunities. In: Yacef, K., Zaiane, O., Hershkovitz, A., Yudelson, M., Stamper, J. (eds.) EDM 2012 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on International Educational Data Mining Society, pp. 118–125 (2012)
Pardos, Z., Heffernan, N.: Modeling individualization in a Bayesian networks implementation of knowledge tracing. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Yudelson, M.V., Koedinger, K.R., Gordon, G.J.: Individualized Bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Pirolli, P., Wilson, M.: A theory of the measurement of knowledge content, access, and learning. Psychol. Rev. 105(1), 58–82 (1998)
Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R., Junker, B.: Comparing two IRT models for conjunctive skills. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 796–798. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Pavlik, Jr., P.I., Yudelson, M., Koedinger, K.R.: Using contextual factors analysis to explain transfer of least common multiple skills. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 256–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Harvey, L., Anderson, J.: Transfer of declarative knowledge in complex information processing domains. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 11(1), 69–96 (1996)
Zwann, R., Singer, M.: Text comprehension. In: Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M., Goldman, S. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Processes, pp. 83–121. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)
Arroyo, I., Beck, J.E., Park Woolf, B., Beal, C.R., Schultz, K.: Macroadapting animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 574–583. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V.: More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in bayesian knowledge tracing. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 406–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Koedinger, K.R., Stamper, J.C., McLaughlin, E.A., Nixon, T.: Using data-driven discovery of better student models to improve student learning. In: Lane, H., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 421–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under the grant “Knowing What Students Know: Using Education Data Mining to Predict Robust STEM Learning”, award number DRL1420609.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eagle, M. et al. (2016). Estimating Individual Differences for Student Modeling in Intelligent Tutors from Reading and Pretest Data. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39582-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39583-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)