Abstract
This study examined the proportional learning gains attained by 165 college students as they learned about the human circulatory system over two sessions with the intelligent tutoring system, MetaTutor. Results indicated that learners in the prompt and feedback condition, which were afforded the full capabilities of the four pedagogical agents (PAs), attained significantly greater proportional learning gains than learners in the control condition who did not receive the same scaffolding. In addition, we also found that the amount of time spent with each PA produced different types of impacts on the learners, with Sam the Strategizer having the most influence on proportional learning gains. Lastly, results from the revised Agent Persona Inventory (API), administered following the learning session with MetaTutor, revealed key findings regarding learners’ overall retrospective affective reactions towards each individual PA. These results have implications for the design of future PAs capable of offering real-time and adaptive pedagogical instruction within Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We used the proportional learning gain formula commonly used by ITS researchers (e.g., Azevedo, D’Mello, Graesser, Graffsgaard).
References
Azevedo, R.: Metacognition and multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia, 2nd edn, pp. 647–672. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Biswas, G., et al.: Smart open-ended learning environments that support learners cognitive and metacognitive processes. In: Holzinger, A., Pasi, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Knowledge Discovery in Complex, Unstructured, Big Data, pp. 303–310. Springer, Berlin (2013)
D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.C.: AutoTutor and affective autotutor: learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Trans. Inter. Intell. Syst. 2, 23–39 (2012)
Azevedo, R., et al.: Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agent systems. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 427–449. Springer, Amsterdam (2013)
Lester, J., et al.: Narrative-centered learning environments: a story-centric approach to educational games. In: Mouza, C., Lavigne, N. (eds.) Emerging Technologies for the Classroom: A Learning Sciences Perspective, pp. 223–238. Springer, Manhattan (2013)
Winne, P.H., Azevedo, R.: Metacognition. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Taub, M. et al.: The role of pedagogical agents on learning: issues and trends. In: Neto, F., Souza, R., Gomes, A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on 3-D Virtual Environments and Hypermedia for Ubiquitous Learning. IGI Global, Hershey (in press)
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (DRL 1431552). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martin, S.A., Azevedo, R., Taub, M., Mudrick, N.V., Millar, G.C., Grafsgaard, J.F. (2016). Are There Benefits of Using Multiple Pedagogical Agents to Support and Foster Self-Regulated Learning in an Intelligent Tutoring System?. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39582-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39583-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)