Skip to main content

Are There Benefits of Using Multiple Pedagogical Agents to Support and Foster Self-Regulated Learning in an Intelligent Tutoring System?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9684))

Abstract

This study examined the proportional learning gains attained by 165 college students as they learned about the human circulatory system over two sessions with the intelligent tutoring system, MetaTutor. Results indicated that learners in the prompt and feedback condition, which were afforded the full capabilities of the four pedagogical agents (PAs), attained significantly greater proportional learning gains than learners in the control condition who did not receive the same scaffolding. In addition, we also found that the amount of time spent with each PA produced different types of impacts on the learners, with Sam the Strategizer having the most influence on proportional learning gains. Lastly, results from the revised Agent Persona Inventory (API), administered following the learning session with MetaTutor, revealed key findings regarding learners’ overall retrospective affective reactions towards each individual PA. These results have implications for the design of future PAs capable of offering real-time and adaptive pedagogical instruction within Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We used the proportional learning gain formula commonly used by ITS researchers (e.g., Azevedo, D’Mello, Graesser, Graffsgaard).

References

  1. Azevedo, R.: Metacognition and multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia, 2nd edn, pp. 647–672. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Biswas, G., et al.: Smart open-ended learning environments that support learners cognitive and metacognitive processes. In: Holzinger, A., Pasi, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Knowledge Discovery in Complex, Unstructured, Big Data, pp. 303–310. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.C.: AutoTutor and affective autotutor: learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Trans. Inter. Intell. Syst. 2, 23–39 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azevedo, R., et al.: Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agent systems. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 427–449. Springer, Amsterdam (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lester, J., et al.: Narrative-centered learning environments: a story-centric approach to educational games. In: Mouza, C., Lavigne, N. (eds.) Emerging Technologies for the Classroom: A Learning Sciences Perspective, pp. 223–238. Springer, Manhattan (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Winne, P.H., Azevedo, R.: Metacognition. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taub, M. et al.: The role of pedagogical agents on learning: issues and trends. In: Neto, F., Souza, R., Gomes, A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on 3-D Virtual Environments and Hypermedia for Ubiquitous Learning. IGI Global, Hershey (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (DRL 1431552). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth A. Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martin, S.A., Azevedo, R., Taub, M., Mudrick, N.V., Millar, G.C., Grafsgaard, J.F. (2016). Are There Benefits of Using Multiple Pedagogical Agents to Support and Foster Self-Regulated Learning in an Intelligent Tutoring System?. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39582-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39583-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics