Skip to main content

On the Relations Between Security Notions in Hierarchical Key Assignment Schemes for Dynamic Structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Security and Privacy (ACISP 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 9723))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A hierarchical key assignment scheme distribute some private information and encryption keys to a set of classes in a partially ordered hierarchy, so that the private information of higher classes can be employed to derive the keys of classes lower down in the hierarchy. A hierarchical key assignment scheme for dynamic structures allows to make dynamic updates to the hierarchy, such as addition, deletion and modification of classes and relations among them, as well as the revocation of users.

In this work we analyze security notions for hierarchical key assignment schemes supporting dynamic structures. In particular, we first propose the notion of key recovery for those schemes. Furthermore, we extend to such schemes the strong key indistinguishability and strong key recovery security definitions proposed by Freire et al. for hierarchical key assignment schemes. Finally, we investigate the relations occurring between all the state-of-the-art security notions for hierarchical key assignment schemes supporting dynamic structures, showing implications and separations which hold between such notions. In detail, we prove that also in the case of dynamic structures, security with respect to strong key indistinguishability is equivalent to the one with respect to key indistinguishability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aho, A.V., Garey, M.R., Ullman, J.D.: The transitive reduction of a directed graph. SIAM J. Comput. 1(2), 131–137 (1972). doi:10.1137/0201008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akl, S.G., Taylor, P.D.: Cryptographic solution to a problem of access control in a hierarchy. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1(3), 239–248 (1983). doi:10.1145/357369.357372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atallah, M.J., Blanton, M., Fazio, N., Frikken, K.B.: Dynamic and efficient key management for access hierarchies. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 12(3), 18 (2009). doi:10.1145/1455526.1455531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atallah, M.J., Blanton, M., Frikken, K.B.: Key management for non-tree access hierarchies. In: Ferraiolo, D.F., Ray, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT 2006, Lake Tahoe, California, USA, 7–9 June 2006, pp. 11–18. ACM (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133058.1133062

  5. Atallah, M.J., Blanton, M., Frikken, K.B.: Incorporating temporal capabilities in existing key management schemes. In: Biskup, J., López, J. (eds.) ESORICS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4734, pp. 515–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74835-9_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Atallah, M.J., Frikken, K.B., Blanton, M.: Dynamic and efficient key management for access hierarchies. In: Atluri, V., Meadows, C., Juels, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2005, Alexandria, VA, USA, 7–11 November 2005, pp. 190–202. ACM (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102120.1102147

  7. Ateniese, G., De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Provably-securetime-bound hierarchical key assignment schemes. In: Juels, A., Wright, R.N., di Vimercati, S.D.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2006, Alexandria, VA, USA, October 30–November 3 2006, pp. 288–297. ACM (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1180405.1180441

  8. Ateniese, G., De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Provably-secure time-bound hierarchical key assignment schemes. J. Cryptology 25(2), 243–270 (2012). doi:10.1007/s00145-010-9094-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cafaro, M., Civino, R., Masucci, B.: On the equivalence of two security notions for hierarchical key assignment schemes in the unconditional setting. IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput. 12(4), 485–490 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castiglione, A., De Santis, A., Masucci, B.: Hierarchical and shared key assignment. In: 17th International Conference on Network-Based InformationSystems, NBIS 2014, pp. 263–270. IEEE (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NBiS.2014.106

  11. Castiglione, A., De Santis, A., Masucci, B.: Key indistinguishability vs. strong key indistinguishability for hierarchical key assignment schemes. IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput. (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2015.2413415

  12. Castiglione, A., De Santis, A., Masucci, B., Palmieri, F., Castiglione, A., Li, J., Huang, X.: Hierarchical and shared access control. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 11(4), 850–865 (2016). doi:10.1109/TIFS.2015.2512533

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castiglione, A., De Santis, A., Masucci, B., et al.: Cryptographic hierarchical access control for dynamic structures. Manuscript Submitted for Publication in IEEE Transactions of Information Forensics and Security (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T., Chung, Y.: Hierarchical access control based on chinese remainder theorem and symmetric algorithm. Comput. Secur. 21(6), 565–570 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0167-4048(02)01016-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chien, H.: Efficient time-bound hierarchical key assignment scheme. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16(10), 1301–1304 (2004). doi:10.1109/TKDE.2004.59

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Arco, P., De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Security and tradeoffs of the Akl-Taylor scheme and its variants. In: Královič, R., Niwiński, D. (eds.) MFCS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5734, pp. 247–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03816-7_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Arco, P., Santis, A.D., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Variations on a theme by Akl and Taylor: security and tradeoffs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(1), 213–227 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.09.028

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Cryptographic key assignment schemes for any access control policy. Inf. Process. Lett. 92(4), 199–205 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Enforcing the security of a time-bound hierarchical key assignment scheme. Inf. Sci. 176(12), 1684–1694 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.ins.2005.07.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Unconditionally secure key assignment schemes. Discrete Appl. Math. 154(2), 234–252 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.dam.2005.03.025

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Efficient provably-secure hierarchical key assignment schemes. In: Kučera, L., Kučera, A. (eds.) MFCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4708, pp. 371–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74456-6_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: New constructions for provably-secure time-bound hierarchical key assignment schemes. In: Lotz, V., Thuraisingham, B.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT 2007, Sophia Antipolis, France, 20–22 June 2007, pp. 133–138. ACM (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1266840.1266861

  23. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: New constructions for provably-secure time-bound hierarchical key assignment schemes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 407(1–3), 213–230 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.05.021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., Masucci, B.: Efficient provably-secure hierarchical key assignment schemes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(41), 5684–5699 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2011.06.024

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Freire, E.S.V., Paterson, K.G.: Provably secure key assignment schemes from factoring. In: Parampalli, U., Hawkes, P. (eds.) ACISP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6812, pp. 292–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22497-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Freire, E.S.V., Paterson, K.G., Poettering, B.: Simple, efficient and strongly KI-secure hierarchical key assignment schemes. In: Dawson, E. (ed.) CT-RSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7779, pp. 101–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Harn, L., Lin, H.: A cryptographic key generation scheme for multilevel data security. Comput. Secur. 9(6), 539–546 (1990). doi:10.1016/0167-4048(90)90132-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, H., Chang, C.: A new cryptographic key assignment scheme with time-constraint access control in a hierarchy. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 26(3), 159–166 (2004). doi:10.1016/S0920-5489(03)00073-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liaw, H., Wang, S., Lei, C.: A dynamic cryptographic key assignment scheme in a tree structure. Comput. Math. Appl. 25(6), 109–114 (1993). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/089812219390305F

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, C.H.: Dynamic key management schemes for access control in a hierarchy. Comput. Commun. 20(15), 1381–1385 (1997). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014036649700100X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin, I.C., Hwang, M.S., Chang, C.C.: A new key assignment scheme for enforcing complicated access control policies in hierarchy. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 19(4), pp. 457 – 462 (2003). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X02002005. Selected Papers from the IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Berlin, Germany, 21–24 May 2002

  32. MacKinnon, S.J., Taylor, P.D., Meijer, H., Akl, S.G.: An optimal algorithm for assigning cryptographic keys to control access in a hierarchy. IEEE Trans. Comput. 34(9), 797–802 (1985). doi:10.1109/TC.1985.1676635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Min-Shiang, H.: A cryptographic key assignment scheme in a hierarchy for access control. Math. Comput. Model. 26(2), 27–31 (1997). doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(97)00120-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Sandhu, R.S.: Cryptographic implementation of a tree hierarchy for access control. Inf. Process. Lett. 27(2), 95–98 (1988). doi:10.1016/0020-0190(88)90099-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen, V.R.L., Chen, T.: A novel key management scheme based on discrete logarithms and polynomial interpolations. Comput. Secur. 21(2), 164–171 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0167-4048(02)00211-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang, Q., Mitchell, C.J.: Comments on a cryptographic key assignment scheme. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 27(3), 323–326 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.csi.2004.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tzeng, W.: A time-bound cryptographic key assignment scheme for access control in a hierarchy. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 14(1), 182–188 (2002). doi:10.1109/69.979981

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Tzeng, W.: A secure system for data access based on anonymous authentication and time-dependent hierarchical keys. In: Lin, F., Lee, D., Lin, B.P., Shieh, S., Jajodia, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, ASIACCS 2006, Taipei,Taiwan, 21–24 March 2006, pp. 223–230. ACM (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1128817.1128851

  39. Wang, S., Laih, C.: Merging: an efficient solution for a time-bound hierarchical key assignment scheme. IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput. 3(1), 91–100 (2006). doi:10.1109/TDSC.2006.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, T., Chang, C.: Cryptographic key assignment scheme for hierarchical access control. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 16(1), 25–28 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yeh, J., Chow, R., Newman, R.: A key assignment for enforcing access control policy exceptions. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Internet Technology, pp. 54–59 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yeh, J.: An RSA-based time-bound hierarchical key assignment scheme for electronic article subscription. In: Herzog, O., Schek, H., Fuhr, N., Chowdhury, A., Teiken, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 ACM CIKM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bremen,Germany, 31 October–5 November 2005, pp. 285–286. ACM (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099554.1099629

  43. Yi, X.: Security of chien’s efficient time-bound hierarchical key assignment scheme. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(9), 1298–1299 (2005). doi:10.1109/TKDE.2005.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yi, X., Ye, Y.: Security of tzeng’s time-bound key assignment scheme for access control in a hierarchy. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15(4), 1054–1055 (2003). doi:10.1109/TKDE.2003.1209023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Research within PRIN project “GenData 2020” (2010RTFWBH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aniello Castiglione .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castiglione, A., De Santis, A., Masucci, B., Palmieri, F., Castiglione, A. (2016). On the Relations Between Security Notions in Hierarchical Key Assignment Schemes for Dynamic Structures. In: Liu, J., Steinfeld, R. (eds) Information Security and Privacy. ACISP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9723. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40367-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40367-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40366-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40367-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics