Skip to main content

A Proposal for Modelling Agrifood Chains as Multi Agent Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2016)

Abstract

Viewing the modelling of agrifood chains (AFC) from a multi agent systems (MAS) point of view opens up numerous avenues for research while building upon existing advancements in the state of the art. This paper explores different aspects in MAS research areas in consensus and cooperation (argumentation, negotiation, normative systems, multi agent resource allocation and social affects) and provides insights into how viewing classical AFC problems from this perspective can bring new perspectives and research avenues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks. In: Liu, W. (ed.) ECSQARU 2011. LNCS, vol. 6717, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, K., et al.: The TARDIS framework: intelligent virtual agents for social coaching in job interviews. In: Reidsma, D., Katayose, H., Nijholt, A. (eds.) ACE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8253, pp. 476–491. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Arioua, A., Croitoru, M.: Formalizing explanatory dialogues. In: Beierle, C., Dekhtyar, A. (eds.) SUM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9310, pp. 282–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Arioua, A., Tamani, N., Croitoru, M.: On conceptual graphs and explanation of query answering under inconsistency. In: Hernandez, N., Jäschke, R., Croitoru, M. (eds.) ICCS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8577, pp. 51–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arioua, A., Tamani, N., Croitoru, M.: Query answering explanation in inconsistent datalog \(+/-\) knowledge bases. In: Chen, Q., Hameurlain, A., Toumani, F., Wagner, R., Decker, H. (eds.) DEXA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9261, pp. 203–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Arioua, A., Tamani, N., Croitoru, M., Buche, P.: Query failure explanation in inconsistent knowledge bases: a dialogical approach. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds.) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXI, pp. 119–133. Springer, Switzerland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Atencia, M., Chein, M., Croitoru, M., David, J., Leclère, M., Pernelle, N., Saïs, F., Scharffe, F., Symeonidou, D.: Defining key semantics for the RDF datasets: experiments and evaluations. In: Hernandez, N., Jäschke, R., Croitoru, M. (eds.) ICCS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8577, pp. 65–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baget, J.-F., Mugnier, M.-L., Rudolph, S., Thomazo, M.: Walking the complexity lines for generalized guarded existential rules. In: IJCAI Proceedings-International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, p. 712 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beneventano, D., Bergamaschi, S., Sorrentino, S., Vincini, M., Benedetti, F.: Semantic annotation of the cerealab database by the agrovoc linked dataset. Ecol. Inform. 26, 119–126 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. In: Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts, pp. 205–227 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs, W., Cook, D.: Flexible social laws. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 14, pp. 688–693. Citeseer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chevaleyre, Y., Dunne, P.E., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Maudet, N., RodrÍGuez-Aguilar, J.A.: Multiagent resource allocation. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20(02), 143–149 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Croitoru, M., Fortin, J., Mosse, P., Buche, P., Guillard, V., Guillaume, C.: Bio-sourced and biodegradable packaging design using argumentation to aggregate stakeholder preferences. In: EFFoST 2012 Annual Meeting, p. 1 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Croitoru, M., Fortin, J., Nir, O.: Arguing with preferences in ecobiocap. In: COMMA 2012: Computational Models of Argument, vol. 245, pp. 51–58. IOS Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Croitoru, M., Oren, N., Miles, S., Luck, M.: Graphical norms via conceptual graphs. Knowl.-Based Syst. 29, 31–43 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Croitoru, M., Thomopoulos, R., Tamani, N.: A practical application of argumentation in French agrifood chains. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2014, Part I. CCIS, vol. 442, pp. 56–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Croitoru, M., Thomopoulos, R., Vesic, S.: Introducing preference-based argumentation to inconsistentontological knowledge bases. In: Chen, Q., et al. (eds.) PRIMA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9387, pp. 594–602. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Guillard, V., Buche, P., Destercke, S., Tamani, N., Croitoru, M., Menut, L., Guillaume, C., Gontard, N.: A decision support system to design modified atmosphere packaging for fresh produce based on a bipolar flexible querying approach. Comput. Electron. Agric. 111, 131–139 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ieong, S., Shoham, Y.: Marginal contribution nets: a compact representation scheme for coalitional games. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 193–202. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A roadmap of agent research and development. Auton. Agents Multi-agent Syst. 1(1), 7–38 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lauser, B., Sini, M., Liang, A., Keizer, J., Katz, S.: From agrovoc to the agricultural ontology service/concept server. an owl model for creating ontologies in the agricultural domain. In: Dublin Core Conference Proceedings. Dublin Core DCMI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R., Ruzzi, M., Savo, D.F.: Inconsistency-tolerant semantics for description logics. In: Hitzler, P., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) RR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6333, pp. 103–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lukose, D.: World-wide semantic web of agriculture knowledge. J. Integr. Agricu. 11(5), 769–774 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Muljarto, A.-R., Salmon, J.-M., Neveu, P., Charnomordic, B., Buche, P.: Ontology-based model for food transformation processes - application to winemaking. In: Closs, S., Studer, R., Garoufallou, E., Sicilia, M.-A. (eds.) MTSR 2014. CCIS, vol. 478, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, A., Murray, R.M.: Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc. IEEE 95(1), 215–233 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pernelle, N., Saïs, F., Symeonidou, D.: An automatic key discovery approach for data linking. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 23, 16–30 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pokharel, S., Sherif, M.A., Lehmann, J.: Ontology based data access and integration for improving the effectiveness of farming in nepal. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), vol. 02, pp. 319–326. IEEE Computer Society (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P., et al.: Bdi agents: From theory to practice. In: ICMAS 1995, pp. 312–319 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Formation of overlapping coalitions for precedence-ordered task-execution among autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of ICMAS 1996, pp. 330–337 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Soergel, D., Lauser, B., Liang, A., Fisseha, F., Keizer, J., Katz, S.: Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the agrovoc example. J. Digital Inform. 4(4), 1–23 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tamani, N., Croitoru, M., Buche, P.: Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp. 1553–1554. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tamani, N., Mosse, P., Croitoru, M., Buche, P., Guillard, V.: A food packaging use case for argumentation. In: Closs, S., Studer, R., Garoufallou, E., Sicilia, M.-A. (eds.) MTSR 2014. CCIS, vol. 478, pp. 344–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tamani, N., Mosse, P., Croitoru, M., Buche, P., Guillard, V., Guillaume, C., Gontard, N.: Eco-efficient packaging material selection for fresh produce: industrial session. In: Hernandez, N., Jäschke, R., Croitoru, M. (eds.) ICCS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8577, pp. 305–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tamani, N., Mosse, P., Croitoru, M., Buche, P., Guillard, V., Guillaume, C., Gontard, N.: An argumentation system for eco-efficient packaging material selection. Comput. Electron. Agric. 113, 174–192 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomopoulos, R., Croitoru, M., Tamani, N.: Decision support for agri-food chains: A reverse engineering argumentation-based approach. Ecol. Inform. 26, 182–191 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: On the logic of cooperation and propositional control. Artif. Intell. 164(1), 81–119 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the support of ANR grants ASPIQ (ANR-12-BS02-0003), QUALINCA (ANR-12-0012) and DURDUR (ANR-13-ALID-0002). The work of the first author was carried out part of the research delegation at INRA MISTEA and INRA IATE CEPIA Axe 5, Montpellier.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madalina Croitoru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Croitoru, M. et al. (2016). A Proposal for Modelling Agrifood Chains as Multi Agent Systems. In: Carvalho, J., Lesot, MJ., Kaymak, U., Vieira, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 610. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40596-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40595-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40596-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics