Skip to main content

A Measure of Regional Mammographic Masking Based on the CDMAM Phantom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Detectability of invasive cancerous lesions in mammography is diminished in breasts with dense and complex fibroglandular tissue. If masking were locally quantified in mammograms, radiologists could potentially use this information to clear the region using targeted adjuvant screening techniques. We present a method to quantify localized masking using a model observer to detect virtual objects of varying thickness and size convoluted into the clinical mammogram. Contrast detail curves are used to create an Image Quality Factor (IQF) at high resolution throughout the breast. We report on preliminary findings of how IQF is related to measures of breast density and textural complexity in a cohort of women who experienced screening detected and interval (masked) cancers. This measure of masking using a localized contrast detail curve approach should provide a means to target adjuvant screening resources for faster and more effective determination of cancer status for women with dense breast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tabar, L., Faberberg, G., Day, N., Holmberg, L.: What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br. J. Cancer 55(5), 547 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shepherd, J., Herve, L., Landau, J., Fan, B., Kerlikowske, K., Cummings, S.: Novel use of single X-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4(2), 173–182 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Highnam, R., Sauber, N., Destounis, S., Harvey, J., McDonald, D.: Breast density into clinical practice. In: Maidment, A.D., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds.) IWDM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7361, pp. 466–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartman, K., Highnam, R.P., Warren, R., Jackson, V.: Volumetric assessment of breast tissue composition from FFDM images. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 33–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Manduca, A., Carston, M., Heine, J., Scott, C., Pankratz, V., Brandt, K., et al.: Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 18(3), 837–845 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nie, K., Chen, J., Hon, J., Chu, Y., Nalcioglu, O., Su, M.: Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad. Radiol. 15(12), 1513–1525 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, N., Dite, G., Stone, J., Gunasekara, A., English, D., McCredie, M., et al.: Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(12), 886–894 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eng, A., Gallant, Z., Shepherd, J., McCormack, V., Li, J., Dowsett, M., dos-Santos-Silva, I., et al.: Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res. 16, 439 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerlikowske, K., Zhu, W., Tosteson, A., Sprague, B., Tice, J., Lehman, C., et al.: Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 162(10), 673–681 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mainprize, J.G., Wang, X., Ge, M., Yaffe, M.J.: Towards a quantitative measure of radiographic masking by dense tissue in mammography. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds.) IWDM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8539, pp. 181–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boone, J., Fewell, T., Jennings, R.: Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. Med. Phys. 24(12), 1863–1874 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yip, M., Chukwu, W., Kottis, E., Lewis, E., Oduko, J., Gundogdu,O., et al.: Automated scoring method for the CDMAM phantom. In: Sahiner, B., Manning, D.J., (eds.), pp. 72631A–72631A–10 (2009). http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=816030. [cited 2 Nov 2015]

  13. Rico, R., Muller, S.L., Peter, G., Noel, A., Stines, J.: Automated scoring of CDMAM: a dose study. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics on Medical Imaging 2003, pp. 164–173 (2003). http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=758494. [cited 2 Nov 2015]

  14. Veldkamp, W.J.H., Thijssen, M.A.O., Karssemeijer, N.: The value of scatter removal by a grid in full field digital mammography. Med. Phys. 30(7), 1712 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grosjean, B., Muller, S.: Impact of textured background on scoring of simulated CDMAM phantom. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 460–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F11783237_62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the CBCRP for their generous grant that made this work possible under grant #21IB-0130. I would further like to thank the Shepherd Lab, Bo Fan, Jesus Avila, Bennett Ng, and the NSF GRFP for various types of support: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1144247. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Hinton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hinton, B. et al. (2016). A Measure of Regional Mammographic Masking Based on the CDMAM Phantom. In: Tingberg, A., LÃ¥ng, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics