Abstract
Detectability of invasive cancerous lesions in mammography is diminished in breasts with dense and complex fibroglandular tissue. If masking were locally quantified in mammograms, radiologists could potentially use this information to clear the region using targeted adjuvant screening techniques. We present a method to quantify localized masking using a model observer to detect virtual objects of varying thickness and size convoluted into the clinical mammogram. Contrast detail curves are used to create an Image Quality Factor (IQF) at high resolution throughout the breast. We report on preliminary findings of how IQF is related to measures of breast density and textural complexity in a cohort of women who experienced screening detected and interval (masked) cancers. This measure of masking using a localized contrast detail curve approach should provide a means to target adjuvant screening resources for faster and more effective determination of cancer status for women with dense breast.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tabar, L., Faberberg, G., Day, N., Holmberg, L.: What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br. J. Cancer 55(5), 547 (1987)
Shepherd, J., Herve, L., Landau, J., Fan, B., Kerlikowske, K., Cummings, S.: Novel use of single X-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4(2), 173–182 (2005)
Highnam, R., Sauber, N., Destounis, S., Harvey, J., McDonald, D.: Breast density into clinical practice. In: Maidment, A.D., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds.) IWDM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7361, pp. 466–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Hartman, K., Highnam, R.P., Warren, R., Jackson, V.: Volumetric assessment of breast tissue composition from FFDM images. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 33–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Manduca, A., Carston, M., Heine, J., Scott, C., Pankratz, V., Brandt, K., et al.: Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 18(3), 837–845 (2009)
Nie, K., Chen, J., Hon, J., Chu, Y., Nalcioglu, O., Su, M.: Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad. Radiol. 15(12), 1513–1525 (2008)
Boyd, N., Dite, G., Stone, J., Gunasekara, A., English, D., McCredie, M., et al.: Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(12), 886–894 (2002)
Eng, A., Gallant, Z., Shepherd, J., McCormack, V., Li, J., Dowsett, M., dos-Santos-Silva, I., et al.: Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res. 16, 439 (2014)
Kerlikowske, K., Zhu, W., Tosteson, A., Sprague, B., Tice, J., Lehman, C., et al.: Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 162(10), 673–681 (2015)
Mainprize, J.G., Wang, X., Ge, M., Yaffe, M.J.: Towards a quantitative measure of radiographic masking by dense tissue in mammography. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds.) IWDM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8539, pp. 181–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Boone, J., Fewell, T., Jennings, R.: Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. Med. Phys. 24(12), 1863–1874 (1997)
Yip, M., Chukwu, W., Kottis, E., Lewis, E., Oduko, J., Gundogdu,O., et al.: Automated scoring method for the CDMAM phantom. In: Sahiner, B., Manning, D.J., (eds.), pp. 72631A–72631A–10 (2009). http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=816030. [cited 2 Nov 2015]
Rico, R., Muller, S.L., Peter, G., Noel, A., Stines, J.: Automated scoring of CDMAM: a dose study. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics on Medical Imaging 2003, pp. 164–173 (2003). http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=758494. [cited 2 Nov 2015]
Veldkamp, W.J.H., Thijssen, M.A.O., Karssemeijer, N.: The value of scatter removal by a grid in full field digital mammography. Med. Phys. 30(7), 1712 (2003)
Grosjean, B., Muller, S.: Impact of textured background on scoring of simulated CDMAM phantom. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 460–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F11783237_62
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the CBCRP for their generous grant that made this work possible under grant #21IB-0130. I would further like to thank the Shepherd Lab, Bo Fan, Jesus Avila, Bennett Ng, and the NSF GRFP for various types of support: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1144247. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hinton, B. et al. (2016). A Measure of Regional Mammographic Masking Based on the CDMAM Phantom. In: Tingberg, A., LÃ¥ng, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)