Skip to main content

Improving Breast Mass Segmentation in Local Dense Background: An Entropy Based Optimization of Statistical Region Merging Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, an optimization algorithm, utilizing a component measure of entropy, is developed for automatically tuning segmentation of mammograms by the Statistical Region Merging technique. The aim of this paper is to improve the mass segmentation in dense backgrounds. The proposed algorithm is tested on a database of 89 mammograms of which 41 have masses localized in dense background and 48 have masses in non-dense background. The algorithm performance is evaluated in conjunction with six standard enhancement techniques: Adjustable Histogram Equalization, Unsharp Masking, Neutrosophy based enhancement, standard CLAHE, Adaptive Clip Limit CLAHE based on standard deviation and Adaptive Clip Limit CLAHE based on standard entropy measure. For a comparison study, same experiments are performed using Fuzzy C-means Clustering technique. The experimental results show that the automatic tuning of SRM segmentation has the potential to produce an accurate segmentation of masses located in dense background while not compromising the performance on masses located in non-dense background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO): WHO position paper on mammography screening. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva (Switzerland) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbas, Q., Celebi, M.E., Garcia, I.F.: Breast mass segmentation using region-based and edge-based methods in a 4-stage multiscale system. Biomed. Sig. Process. Control 8(2), 204–214 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arici, T., Dikbas, S., Altunbasak, Y.: A histogram modification framework and its application for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18(9), 1921–1935 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bajger, M., Lee, G.N., Caon, M.: 3D segmentation for multi-organs in CT images. Electron. Lett. Comput. Vis. Image Anal. 12(2), 13–27 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bajger, M., Ma, F., Williams, S., Bottema, M.: Mammographic mass detection with statistical region merging. In: 2010 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, pp. 27–32. Syndey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caon, M., Sedlar, J., Bajger, M., Lee, G.: Computer-assisted segmentation of CT images by statistical region merging for the production of voxel models of anatomy for CT dosimetry. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 37(2), 393–403 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castellano, C.R., Nunez, C.V., Boy, R.C., et al.: Impact of mammographic breast density on computer-assisted detection (CAD) in a breast imaging department. Radiologia 53, 456–461 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Celebi, M.E., Kingravi, H.A., Iyatomi, H., et al.: Border detection in dermoscopy images using statistical region merging. Skin Res. Technol. 14(3), 347–353 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guoa, Y., Cheng, H.D.: New neutrosophic approach to image segmentation. Pattern Recogn. 42, 587–595 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., et al.: The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 212–218. Medical Physics Publishing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, G.N., Bajger, M.: Statistical temporal changes for breast cancer detection: a preliminary study. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds.) IWDM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8539, pp. 635–642. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morton, M.J., Whaley, D.H., Brandt, K.R., et al.: Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection prospective evaluation. Radiology 239, 204–212 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nock, R., Nielsen, F.: Statistical region merging. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(11), 1452–1458 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Marti, J., Perez, E., Pont, J., Denton, E., Zwiggelaar, R.: A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Med. Image Anal. 2, 87–110 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sajeev, S., Bajger, M., Lee, G.: Segmentation of breast masses in local dense background using adaptive clip limit-CLAHE. In: 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), DICTA 2015, pp. 669–676. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, H., Fritts, J.E., Goldman, S.A.: An entropy-based objective evaluation method for image segmentation. In: Proceedings of SPIE: Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia, vol. 5307, pp. 38–49 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Peter Downey, clinical radiologist of BreastScreen SA for validating the core mass contours and valuable comments and discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelda Sajeev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sajeev, S., Bajger, M., Lee, G. (2016). Improving Breast Mass Segmentation in Local Dense Background: An Entropy Based Optimization of Statistical Region Merging Method. In: Tingberg, A., LÃ¥ng, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_79

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics