Skip to main content

Various Classifiers to Investigate the Relationship Between CSR Activities and Corporate Value

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Applied Knowledge-Based Systems and Data Science (IEA/AIE 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9799))

  • 2587 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance is complex and nuanced. Many studies have reported positive, negative, and neutral impacts of CSR on financial performance. This inconsistency is due to differences in methodologies, approaches, and selection of variables. Rather than focusing on specific variables, the present study aims to classify as many variables as possible in CSR if they contribute to shaping corporate value. In this study, we calculate corporate value using the Ohlson model based on income, since many previous studies focus on only a market-based approach. We chose some common classifiers that were appropriate for the nature of our data. After evaluating the performance of each classifier, we found that the Decision Tree is the best classifier to analyze the relationship between CSR activities and corporate value. Based on the tree, companies with high or medium corporate values seek to enhance their CSR activities or to empower secondary stakeholders (e.g., communities, societies), as indicated by cooperation with NPO/NGO. In contrast, companies with low corporate values still focus their CSR activities on primary stakeholders (e.g., customers, employees).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Girerd-Potin, I., Jimenez-Graces, S., Louvent, P.: Which dimensions of social responsibility concern financial investors? J. Bus. Ethics 10(1), 559–576 (2013). Univ. Grenoble Aples

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chung, K.H., Yu, J.E., Choi, M.G., Shin, J.I.: The effects of CSR on customer satisfaction and loyalty in China: the moderating role of corporate image. J. Econ. Bus. Manag. 3(5) (2015). doi:10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.243

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahearne, M., Bhattacharya, C.B., Gruen, T.: Antecedents and consequences of customer – company identification: expanding the role of relationship marketing. J. Appl. Psychol. 90(3), 574–585 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brammer, S., Millington, A.: The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. J. Bus. Ethics 45, 213–226 (2003). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Neil, H.M., Saunders, C.B., McCarthy, A.D.: Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: are tradeoffs necessary? J. Bus. Ethics 8, 353–357 (1989). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beliveau, B., Cottril, M., O’Neil, H.M.: Predicting corporate social responsiveness: a model drawn from three perspectives. J. Bus. Ethics 13, 731–738 (1994). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelling, E., Elizabeth, A.E.: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the ‘‘virtuous circle’’ revisited. Rev. Quant. Finan. Acc. 32, 197–209 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11156-008-0090-y. Accessed 14 May 2008. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hand, J.R.M., Landsman, W.R.: Testing the Ohlson Model: v or not v, That is the Question, Working Paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Madhulatha, T.S.: An overview on clustering methods. IOSR J. Eng. 2(4), 719–725 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Castro, V.E., Yang, J.: A fast and robust general purpose clustering algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Principles of Knowledge Discovery in Databases and Data Mining (PKDD 2000), Lyon, France, pp. 208–218 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brammer, S., Millington, A.: Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 29, 1325–1343 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ratna Hidayati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hidayati, R., Kanamori, K., Feng, L., Ohwada, H. (2016). Various Classifiers to Investigate the Relationship Between CSR Activities and Corporate Value. In: Fujita, H., Ali, M., Selamat, A., Sasaki, J., Kurematsu, M. (eds) Trends in Applied Knowledge-Based Systems and Data Science. IEA/AIE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9799. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42007-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42007-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42006-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42007-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics