Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Qualitative Characteristics of Combining Evidence with Discounting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Methods for Data Science (SMPS 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 456))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The qualitative characteristics of the combining evidence with the help of Dempster’s rule with discounting is studied in this paper in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory. The discount coefficient (discounting rate) characterizes the reliability of information source. The conflict between evidence and change of ignorance after applying combining rule are considered in this paper as important characteristics of quality of combining. The quantity of ignorance is estimated with the help of linear imprecision index. The set of crisp and fuzzy discounting rates for which the value of ignorance after combining does not increases is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamo JM (1980) Fuzzy decision trees. Fuzzy Sets Syst 4:207–219

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bronevich A, Lepskiy A (2015) Imprecision indices: axiomatic, properties and applications. Int J Gen Syst 44(7–8):812–832

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bronevich A, Rozenberg I (2015) The choice of generalized dempstershafer rules for aggregating belief functions. Int J Approximate Reasoning 56-A:122–136

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38(2):325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois D, Prade H (1985) A note on measures of specificity for fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 10:279–283

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois D, Prade H (1986) A set-theoretic view of belief functions logical operations and approximation by fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 12(3):193–226

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lepskiy A (2013) About relation between the measure of conflict and decreasing of ignorance in theory of evidence. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the European society for fuzzy logic and technology. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam, pp 355–362

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lepskiy A (2014) General schemes of combining rules and the quality characteristics of combining. In: BELIEF 2014, LNAI 8764. Springer, pp 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pichon F, Denoeux T (2009) Interpretation and computation of alpha-junctions for combining belief functions. In: 6th international symposium on imprecise probability: theories and applications (ISIPTA ’09), Durham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sentz K, Ferson S (2002) Combination of evidence in dempster-shafer theory. In: Report SAND 2002-0835, Sandia Nat Labor

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Smets Ph (1995) The canonical decomposition of weighted belief. In: International joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1896–1901

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Government of the Russian Federation within the framework of the implementation o f the 5–100 Programme Roadmap of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is acknowledged. This work was supported by the grant 14-07-00189 of RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, 101000, Moscow, Russia

    Alexander Lepskiy

Authors
  1. Alexander Lepskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Lepskiy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Maria Brigida Ferraro

  2. Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy

    Paolo Giordani

  3. Dept of Basic & Applied Sciences Engg, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Barbara Vantaggi

  4. Dept of Stoc Metds,Polish Academy of Sci, Systems Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland

    Marek Gagolewski

  5. Dept of Statis&OR and MD, Univ de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

    María Ángeles Gil

  6. Dept of Stoc Metds,Polish Aca of Science, Systems Res Inst, Warsaw, Poland

    Przemysław Grzegorzewski

  7. Sys Res Inti, Dept of Stoch Methods, Polish Acadmy Sci in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Olgierd Hryniewicz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lepskiy, A. (2017). The Qualitative Characteristics of Combining Evidence with Discounting. In: Ferraro, M., et al. Soft Methods for Data Science. SMPS 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42971-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42972-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation