Abstract
Companion-Systems need to reason about dynamic properties of their users, e.g., their emotional state, and the current state of the environment. The values of these properties are often not directly accessible; hence information on them must be pieced together from indirect, noisy or partial observations. To ensure probability-based treatment of partial observability on the planning level, planning problems can be modeled as Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs).
While POMDPs can model relevant planning problems, it is algorithmically difficult to solve them. A starting point for mitigating this is that many domains exhibit hierarchical structures where plans consist of a number of higher-level activities, each of which can be implemented in different ways that are known a priori. We show how to make use of such structures in POMDPs using the Partially Observable HTN (POHTN) planning approach by developing a Partially Observable HTN (POHTN) action hierarchy for an example domain derived from an existing deterministic demonstration domain.
We then apply Monte-Carlo Tree Search to POHTNs for generating plans and evaluate both the developed domain and the POHTN approach empirically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
To be precise, this actually introduces n 2 parameter-less abstract actions when n is the number of devices.
References
Bercher, P., Biundo, S., Geier, T., Hoernle, T., Nothdurft, F., Richter, F., Schattenberg, B.: Plan, repair, execute, explain - how planning helps to assemble your home theater. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2014), pp. 386–394. AAAI Press, Palo Alto (2014)
Bercher, P., Richter, F., Hörnle, T., Geier, T., Höller, D., Behnke, G., Nothdurft, F., Honold, F., Minker, W., Weber, M., Biundo, S.: A planning-based assistance system for setting up a home theater. In: Proceedings of the 29th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015). AAAI Press, Palo Alto (2015)
Browne, C.B., Powley, E., Whitehouse, D., Lucas, S.M., Cowling, P.I., Rohlfshagen, P., Tavener, S., Perez, D., Samothrakis, S., Colton, S.: A survey of monte carlo tree search methods. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 4(1), 1–43 (2012)
Dietterich, T.G.: Hierarchical reinforcement learning with the MAXQ value function decomposition. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 13, 227–303 (2000)
Erol, K., Hendler, J., Nau, D.: UMCP: a sound and complete procedure for hierarchical task-network planning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS 1994), pp. 249–254 (1994)
Geier, T., Bercher, P.: On the decidability of HTN planning with task insertion. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 1955–1961 (2011)
Hansen, E.A., Zhou, R.: Synthesis of hierarchical finite-state controllers for POMDPs. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2003), pp. 113–122 (2003)
He, R., Brunskill, E., Roy, N.: PUMA: planning under uncertainty with macro-actions. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2010 (2010)
Honold, F., Bercher, P., Richter, F., Nothdurft, F., Geier, T., Barth, R., Hörnle, T., Schüssel, F., Reuter, S., Rau, M., Bertrand, G., Seegebarth, B., Kurzok, P., Schattenberg, B., Minker, W., Weber, M., Biundo, S.: Companion-technology: towards user- and situation-adaptive functionality of technical systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE 2014), pp. 378–381. IEEE, New York (2014). doi:10.1109/IE.2014.60
Keller, T., Helmert, M.: Trial-based heuristic tree search for finite horizon MDPs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2013), pp. 135–143. AAAI Press, Palo Alto (2013)
Kocsis, L., Szepesvári, C.: Bandit based monte-carlo planning. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML 2006), pp. 282–293 (2006)
Müller, F., Biundo, S.: HTN-style planning in relational POMDPs using first-order FSCs. In: Bach, J., Edelkamp, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 34th Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI 2011), pp. 216–227. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Müller, F., Späth, C., Geier, T., Biundo, S.: Exploiting expert knowledge in factored POMDPs. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2012), pp. 606–611. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2012)
Nau, D., Au, T.C., Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Muñoz-Avila, H., Murdock, J.W., Wu, D., Yaman, F.: Applications of SHOP and SHOP2. IEEE Intell. Syst. 20(2), 34–41 (2005)
Parr, R., Russell, S.J.: Reinforcement learning with hierarchies of machines. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 1997), vol. 10, pp. 1043–1049. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
Pineau, J., Gordon, G., Thrun, S.: Policy-contingent abstraction for robust robot control. In: Proceedings of the 19th conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2003), pp. 477–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)
Sanner, S.: Relational dynamic influence diagram language (RDDL): language description (2010). http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/ ssanner/IPPC_2011/RDDL.pdf
Silver, D., Veness, J.: Monte-carlo planning in large POMDPs. In: Lafferty, J., Williams, C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Zemel, R., Culotta, A. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, pp. 2164–2172. Curran Associates, Red Hook (2010)
Sondik, E.: The optimal control of partially observable Markov decision processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1971)
Sutton, R.S., Precup, D., Singh, S.: Between MDPs and semi-MDPs: a framework for temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning. Artif. Intell. 112(1), 181–211 (1999)
Theocharous, G., Kaelbling, L.P.: Approximate planning in POMDPs with macro-actions. In: Thrun, S., Saul, L., Schölkopf, B. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2004), vol. 16, pp. 775–782. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Acknowledgements
This work was done within the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre SFB/TRR 62 “Companion-Technology for Cognitive Technical Systems” funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richter, F., Biundo, S. (2017). Addressing Uncertainty in Hierarchical User-Centered Planning. In: Biundo, S., Wendemuth, A. (eds) Companion Technology. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43665-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43665-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43664-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43665-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)