Skip to main content

Improving Production Logistics Through Materials Flow Control and Lot Splitting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logistics (ICCL 2016)

Abstract

Competitive advantage of make-to-order manufacturing companies is highly dependent on their capability to offer short delivery times and on time delivery. This calls for effective production and materials flow control – a core part of production logistics. This paper applies discrete simulation to study the delivery performance of a make-to-order manufacturing system configured as a general flow shop, when operated under two card-based material flow control mechanisms: CONWIP and GKS. The influence of two lot splitting strategies on the performance of these mechanisms is also evaluated. Results show that GKS clearly outperforms CONWIP and that splitting strategies have a positive impact on the performance of both mechanisms. GKS also showed to be particularly robust to the variation of the number of production authorisation cards used. This, together with the fact that the card-based mechanisms require little data handling and simplify production control, makes GKS attractive for practical application in make-to-order companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bechte, W.: Load-oriented manufacturing control, just-in-time production for job shops. Prod. Planning Control 5(3), 292–307 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carmo-Silva, S., Alves, A.C.: A framework for understanding cellular manufacturing. In: Ferreira, J.J.P. (ed.) E-Manufacturing: Business Paradigms and Supporting Technologies, pp. 163–172. Springer, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, J.H., Chiu, H.N.: A comprehensive review of lot streaming. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43(8), 1515–1536 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, T.M., Yih, Y.: Generic Kanban systems for dynamic environments. Int. J. Prod. Res. 32(4), 889–902 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, M., Mukherjee, N.J., Sarin, S.C.: A review of lot streaming. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(23–24), 7023–7046 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Enns, S.T.: An integrated system for controlling shop loading and work flow. Int. J. Prod. Res. 33(10), 2801–2820 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Germs, R., Riezebos, J.: Workload balancing capability of pull systems in MTO production. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48(8), 2345–2360 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Henrich, P., Land, M., Gaalman, G.J.C.: Exploring applicability of the workload control concept. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90(2), 187–198 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs, F.R., Bragg, D.J.: Repetitive lots: flow time reductions through sequencing and dynamic batch sizing. Decis. Sci. 19(1), 281–294 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karmarkar, U.S.: Lot sizes, lead times and in-process inventories. Manage. Sci. 33(3), 409–418 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Little, J.: A proof of the theorem L = λW. Oper. Res. 9(3), 383–387 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Nyhuis, P., Wiendahl, H.-P.: Fundamentals of Production Logistics: Theory Tools and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Oosterman, B., Land, M.J., Gaalman, G.J.C.: The influence of shop characteristics on workload control. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 68(1), 107–119 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spearman, M., Woodruff, D.L., Hopp, W.J.: CONWIP: a pull alternative to Kanban. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28(5), 879–894 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner, B.J., Ragatz, G.L.: The impact of lot splitting on due date performance. J. Oper. Manage. 12(1), 13–25 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study had the financial support of COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno O. Fernandes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gomes, C. et al. (2016). Improving Production Logistics Through Materials Flow Control and Lot Splitting. In: Paias, A., Ruthmair, M., Voß, S. (eds) Computational Logistics. ICCL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44896-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44896-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44895-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44896-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics