Abstract
Competitive advantage of make-to-order manufacturing companies is highly dependent on their capability to offer short delivery times and on time delivery. This calls for effective production and materials flow control – a core part of production logistics. This paper applies discrete simulation to study the delivery performance of a make-to-order manufacturing system configured as a general flow shop, when operated under two card-based material flow control mechanisms: CONWIP and GKS. The influence of two lot splitting strategies on the performance of these mechanisms is also evaluated. Results show that GKS clearly outperforms CONWIP and that splitting strategies have a positive impact on the performance of both mechanisms. GKS also showed to be particularly robust to the variation of the number of production authorisation cards used. This, together with the fact that the card-based mechanisms require little data handling and simplify production control, makes GKS attractive for practical application in make-to-order companies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bechte, W.: Load-oriented manufacturing control, just-in-time production for job shops. Prod. Planning Control 5(3), 292–307 (1994)
Carmo-Silva, S., Alves, A.C.: A framework for understanding cellular manufacturing. In: Ferreira, J.J.P. (ed.) E-Manufacturing: Business Paradigms and Supporting Technologies, pp. 163–172. Springer, New York (2004)
Chang, J.H., Chiu, H.N.: A comprehensive review of lot streaming. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43(8), 1515–1536 (2005)
Chang, T.M., Yih, Y.: Generic Kanban systems for dynamic environments. Int. J. Prod. Res. 32(4), 889–902 (1994)
Cheng, M., Mukherjee, N.J., Sarin, S.C.: A review of lot streaming. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(23–24), 7023–7046 (2013)
Enns, S.T.: An integrated system for controlling shop loading and work flow. Int. J. Prod. Res. 33(10), 2801–2820 (1995)
Germs, R., Riezebos, J.: Workload balancing capability of pull systems in MTO production. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48(8), 2345–2360 (2010)
Henrich, P., Land, M., Gaalman, G.J.C.: Exploring applicability of the workload control concept. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90(2), 187–198 (2004)
Jacobs, F.R., Bragg, D.J.: Repetitive lots: flow time reductions through sequencing and dynamic batch sizing. Decis. Sci. 19(1), 281–294 (1988)
Karmarkar, U.S.: Lot sizes, lead times and in-process inventories. Manage. Sci. 33(3), 409–418 (1987)
Little, J.: A proof of the theorem L = λW. Oper. Res. 9(3), 383–387 (1961)
Nyhuis, P., Wiendahl, H.-P.: Fundamentals of Production Logistics: Theory Tools and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Oosterman, B., Land, M.J., Gaalman, G.J.C.: The influence of shop characteristics on workload control. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 68(1), 107–119 (2000)
Spearman, M., Woodruff, D.L., Hopp, W.J.: CONWIP: a pull alternative to Kanban. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28(5), 879–894 (1990)
Wagner, B.J., Ragatz, G.L.: The impact of lot splitting on due date performance. J. Oper. Manage. 12(1), 13–25 (1994)
Acknowledgements
This study had the financial support of COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gomes, C. et al. (2016). Improving Production Logistics Through Materials Flow Control and Lot Splitting. In: Paias, A., Ruthmair, M., Voß, S. (eds) Computational Logistics. ICCL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44896-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44896-1_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44895-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44896-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)