Skip to main content

Mitigating Supply Chain Tardiness Risks in OEM Milk-Run Operations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics in Logistics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Logistics ((LNLO))

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate an optimal vehicle routing scheme to perform an OEM milk-run pickup service over a regional road network. The manufacturing of components is subject to varying tardiness among suppliers when fulfilling OEM orders. This often leads to non-accomplished orders at the end of the vehicle cycle time since the transport operation, predominantly composed by random variables, must comply with a strict delivery time limit set up by the OEM company. The mathematical model searches for the optimal vehicle routing sequence, together with searching for the best tardiness tolerance level that minimizes the sum of penalty costs levied against faulty suppliers, and transport expenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brar GS, Saini G (2011) Milk run logistics: literature review and directions. In: Proceedings of the world congress of engineering, July 6–8, London, vol I

    Google Scholar 

  • Breedam AV (1995) Improvement heuristics for the vehicle routing problem based on simulated annealing. Eur J Oper Res 86:480–490

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead CW, Blackhurst J, Rungtusanatham MJ, Handfield RB (2007) The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decis Sci 38(1):131–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson J, Dahlén P (1997) A conceptual model for disruption causes: A personnel and organization perspective. Int J Prod Econ 52:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grout JR (1996) A model of incentive contracts for just-in-time delivery. Eur J Oper Res 96:139–147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hajji A, Gharbi A, Kenne JP, Pellerin R (2011) Production control and replenishment strategy with multiple suppliers. Eur J Oper Res 208:67–74

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wang Q (2007) Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. Eur J Oper Res 179:1–16

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Melo RA, Wolsey LA (2010) Optimizing production and transportation in a commit-to-delivery business mode. Eur J Oper Res 203:614–618

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Novaes AG, Lima Jr. OF, Carvalho CC, Bez ET (2015) Thermal performance of refrigerated vehicles in the distribution of perishable food. Pesquisa Operacional 35(2):251–284. ISSN: 1678-5142

    Google Scholar 

  • Safaei M, Issa S, Seifert M, Thoben KD, Lang W (2013) A method to estimate the accumulated delivery time uncertainty in supply networks. In: Kreowski HJ, Scholz-Reiter B, Thoben KD (eds) Dynamics in logistics (proceedings: third international conference LDIC 2012, Bremen, Germany). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz-Reiter B, Meinecke C (2013) Towards an integrated production and outbound distribution planning method. In: Kreowski HJ, Scholz-Reiter B, Thoben KD (eds) Dynamics in logistics (proceedings: third international conference LDIC 2012, Bremen, Germany). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang CS (2006) Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Int J Logist Res Appl 9(1):33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Manag Sci 52:639–657

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich CA (2013) Integrated machine scheduling and vehicle routing with time windows. Eur J Oper Res 227:152–165

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR (2009) Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Manag Sci 55:192–209

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer K (2002) Supply chain coordination with uncertain just-in-time delivery. Int J Prod Econ 77:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the Brazilian CNPq Foundation, Projects 302527/2011-7 and 470899/2013-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio G. N. Novaes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Novaes, A.G.N., Lima, O.F., Luna, M.M.M., Bez, E.T. (2017). Mitigating Supply Chain Tardiness Risks in OEM Milk-Run Operations. In: Freitag, M., Kotzab, H., Pannek, J. (eds) Dynamics in Logistics. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45117-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45117-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45116-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45117-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics