Skip to main content

Developing and Evaluating a Readability Measure for Microblogging Communication

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life (WEB 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 258))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1272 Accesses

Abstract

Especially due to the recent expansion of social media platforms, researchers and practitioners exert ever growing efforts to advance big data analytics techniques to derive actionable insights from social networks. Although a substantial body of research has shown that readability is of vital importance for the success of text-based communication, currently it is rarely considered in social media research or especially microblogging. In this research project, we intend to develop a readability measure for microblogging messages that is applicable to large scale data analysis and also provides concrete formulation recommendations for single messages. We will combine text mining and machine learning techniques to analyze a sample of approximately 6.8 million Twitter messages from and about 33 large S&P 100 companies to develop a respective readability measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Risius, M., Akolk, F.: Differentiated sentiment analysis of corporate social media accounts. In: Proceedings of the 21st American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burton, S., Soboleva, A.: Interactive or reactive? Marketing with twitter. J. Consum. Mark. 28, 491–499 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulearca, M., Bulearca, S.: Twitter: a viable marketing tool for SMEs. Glob. Bus. Manag. Res. Int. J. 2, 296–309 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N.S., Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: an analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decis. Support Syst. 52, 674–684 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loughran, T., Mcdonald, B.: Measuring readability in financial disclosures. J. Finance 69, 1643–1671 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davenport, J.R., Deline, R.: The Readability of Tweets and Their Geographic Correlation with Education. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.60582014

  7. Temnikova, I., Vieweg, S., Castillo, C.: The case for readability of crisis communications in social media. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pp. 1245–1250. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubay, W.H.: The Principles of Readability. Online Submission (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zakaluk, B.L., Samuels, S.J.: Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future. ERIC (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rababah, O.M.A., Masoud, F.A.: Key factors for developing a successful E-commerce website. Commun. IBIMA 2010, 1–9 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, X., Keeling, K.B., Pavur, R.J.: Information quality of commericial web site home pages: an explorative analysis. In: 21st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 164–175. Association for Information Systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Molla, A., Licker, P.S.: E-commerce systems success: an attempt to extend and respecify the delone and maclean model of is success. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2, 131–141 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pelet, J.-E., Papadopoulou, P.: The effects of e-commerce websites colors upon consumer trust. In: 38th European Marketing Academy Conference (EMAC) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, Q., Wells, W.D.: Attitude toward the site. J. Advertising Res. 39, 27–37 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, J.Y., Collins-Thompson, K., Bennett, P.N., Dumais, S.T.: Characterizing web content, user interests, and search behavior by reading level and topic. In: 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), pp. 213–222. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., Mishne, G.: Finding high-quality content in social media. In: 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 183–194. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu, Y., Talamadupula, K., and Kambhampati, S.: Dude, srsly?: The surprisingly formal nature of twitter’s language. In: 7th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flesch, R.: A new readability yardstick. J. Appl. Psychol. 32, 221 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruns, A., Stieglitz, S.: Towards more systematic twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 16, 91–108 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chall, J.S., Dale, E.: Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Brookline Books, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morris, R.: Computerized content analysis in management research: a demonstration of advantages & limitations. J. Manag. 20, 903–931 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Risius, M., Beck, R.: Effectiveness of corporate social media activities in increasing relational outcomes. Inf. Manag. 52, 824–839 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens, K.C.: Readability formulae and mccall-crabbs standard test lessons in reading. Reading Teach. 33, 413–415 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marten Risius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Risius, M., Pape, T. (2016). Developing and Evaluating a Readability Measure for Microblogging Communication. In: Sugumaran, V., Yoon, V., Shaw, M. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 258. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45408-5_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics