Skip to main content

Unlocking the Potential of the Process Perspective in Business Transformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 260))

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to gain insights in the positioning and role of the business process support function and, more generally, process-oriented thinking in a business transformation context. The main promise that has been associated with the discipline of Business Process Management (BPM) and process orientation is providing critical support for making business transformation successful. Thus, intuitively, we can expect process support functions in organizations which apply the BPM principles in day-to-day business activities, to take a prominent role in realizing their organization’s current transformation agenda. But is this the case? Through an interview-based qualitative research approach, the question is raised whether business process support function today, in what is claimed to be a more turbulent business environment than before, is actually a co-driver for business transformation. From this research, key takeaways are distilled on the elements shaping the context for process support functions to co-drive business transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to the wide variety of business process support functions names/titles observed in organizations, this paper refers to these units as ‘business process offices’ (BPOs).

References

  1. Hung, R.Y.: Business process management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excellence 17(1), 21–40 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harmon, P.: Business Process Change A Business Process Management Guide for Managers and Process Professionals, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Waltham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hammer, M.: What is business process management? In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann; M. (ed.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods and Information Systems. pp. 3–16. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammer, M.: The process audit. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(4), 111–123 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohlbacher, M., Reijers, H.: The effects of process-oriented organizational design on firm performance. Bus. Process Manage. J. 19(2), 245–262 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer, M., Stanton, S.: How process enterprises really work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77, 108–120 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gartner, Inc. Predicts 2016: Business Transformation and Process Management Bridge the Strategy-to-Execution Gap. Gartner, Inc (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trkman, P.: The critical success factors of business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 30, 125–134 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malinova, M., Mendling, J.: A qualitative research perspective on BPM adoption. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops, pp. 77–88. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karim, J., Somers, T.M., Bhattacherjee, A.: The impact of ERP implementation on business process outcomes: A factor-based study. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 101–134 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosemann, M.: Proposals for future BPM research directions. In: Ouyang, C., Jung, J.-Y. (eds.) AP-BPM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 181, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.002

  13. Harmon, P.: The scope and evolution of business process management. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods and Information Systems. pp. 37–82. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davenport, T.: The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(6), 101–108 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Boer, F., Müller, C., Schwengber ten Caten, C.: Assessment model for organizational business process maturity with a focus on BPM governance practices. Bus. Process Manage. J. 21(4), 908–927 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiedler, F.: A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 1, pp. 149–190. Academic Press, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  17. vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Trkman, P., Mertens, W., Viaene, S.: Ten principles of good business process management. Bus. Process Manage. J. 20(4), 530–548 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahadi, H.R.: An examination of the role of organizational enablers in business process reengineering and the impact of information technology. Inf. Resour. Manage. J. 17(4), 1–19 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paper, D., Chang, R.-D., Rodger, J.: Managing radical transformation at Fannie Mae: A holistic paradigm. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excellence 14(4), 475–489 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franklin, M.: 3 lessons for successful transformational change. Ind. Commercial Training, 46(7), 364–370

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jansen, J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H.: Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: the moderating role of transformational leadership. J. Manage. Stud. 45(5), 982–1007 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acade. Manage. Rev. 28(2), 238–256 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. O’Reilly, C., Tushman, M.: The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(4), 74–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher, D.M.: The Business Process Maturity Model: A Practical Approach for Identifying Opportunities for Optimization. BPTrends (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luftman, J.N., Bullen, C.V.: Managing the Information Technology Resource: Leadership in the Information Age. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Turk, D., Butler, C., Muldoon, K.: A case study on the challenges and tasks of moving to a higher CMMI level. J. Inf. Technol. Manage. 26(2), 20–40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Desouza, K., Evaristo, J.: Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 26(5), 414–423 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van den Bergh, J., Işik, Ö., Viaene, S., Helsen, E.: Re-positioning Business Process Management: Exploring Key Capabilities for Successful Business Transformation, 17p. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Darlington, Y., Scott, D.: Qualitative Research in Practice: Stories from the Field. Open University Press, Buckingham (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kurian, G.T.: The AMA Dictionary of Business and Management. AMACOM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Redlich-Amirav, D., Higginbottom, G.: New emerging technologies in qualitative research. Qual. Rep. 19(12), 1–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Flick, U.: Triangulation in Qualitative Research. In: Flick, U., Kardoff, E., Steinke, I. (eds.) A Companion to Qualitative Research, pp. 178–183. Sage, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rentrop, C., Zimmermann, S.: Shadow IT evaluation model. In: Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 1023–1027 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hobbs, B., Aubry, M.: An empirically grounded search for a typology of project management offices. Proj. Manage. J. 39(S1), 69–82 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Müller, R., Glückler, J., Aubry, M.: A relational typology of project management offices. Proj. Manage. J. 44(S1), 59–76 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all organizations that have contributed by investing their time to inform this research. We also thank Eddy Helsen and Annelies Helsen of ViCre for the funding of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greet Bontinck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bontinck, G., Isik, Ö., Van den Bergh, J., Viaene, S. (2016). Unlocking the Potential of the Process Perspective in Business Transformation. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics