Skip to main content

Relevant Documents Selection for Blind Relevance Feedback in Speech Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9924))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The experiments presented in this paper were aimed at the selection of documents to be used in the blind or pseudo relevance feedback in spoken document retrieval. The previous experiments with the automatic selection of the relevant documents for the blind relevance feedback method have shown the possibilities of the dynamical selection of the relevant documents for each query depending on the content of the retrieved documents instead of just blindly defining the number of the relevant documents to be used in advance. The score normalization techniques commonly used in the speaker identification task are used for the dynamical selection of the relevant documents. In the previous experiments, the language modeling information retrieval method was used. In the experiments presented in this paper, we have derived the score normalization technique also for the vector space information retrieval method. The results of our experiments show, that these normalization techniques are not method-dependent and can be successfully used in several information retrieval system settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ircing, P., Pecina, P., Oard, D.W., Wang, J., White, R.W., Hoidekr, J.: Information retrieval test collection for searching spontaneous Czech speech. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P. (eds.) TSD 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4629, pp. 439–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Sivakumaran, P., Fortuna, J., Ariyaeeinia, M.A.: Score normalisation applied to open-set, text-independent speaker identification. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech, Geneva, pp. 2669–2672 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zajíc, Z., Machlica, L., Padrta, A., Vaněk, J., Radová, V.: An expert system in speaker verification task. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, vol. 9, pp. 355–358. International Speech Communication Association, Brisbane (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Skorkovská, L.: First experiments with relevant documents selection for blind relevance feedback in spoken document retrieval. In: Ronzhin, A., Potapova, R., Delic, V. (eds.) SPECOM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8773, pp. 235–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Skorkovská, L.: Score normalization methods for relevant documents selection for blind relevance feedback in speech information retrieval. In: Král, P., Matoušek, V. (eds.) TSD 2015. LNCS, vol. 9302, pp. 316–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ircing, P., Psutka, J.V., Vavruška, J.: What can and cannot be found in Czech spontaneous speech using document-oriented IR methods — UWB at CLEF 2007 CL-SR track. In: Peters, C., Jijkoun, V., Mandl, T., Müller, H., Oard, D.W., Peñas, A., Petras, V., Santos, D. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152, pp. 712–718. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponte, J.M., Croft, W.B.: A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 1998, pp. 275–281. ACM, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kanis, J., Skorkovská, L.: Comparison of different lemmatization approaches through the means of information retrieval performance. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2010. LNCS, vol. 6231, pp. 93–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Reynolds, D.A., Quatieri, T.F., Dunn, R.B.: Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models. Digit. Sig. Process. 10, 19–41 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Auckenthaler, R., Carey, M., Lloyd-Thomas, H.: Score normalization for text-independent speaker verification systems. Digit. Signal Process. 10(1–3), 42–54 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B., Oard, D.W.: One-sided measures for evaluating ranked retrieval effectiveness with spontaneous conversational speech. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2006, SIGIR 2006, pp. 673–674. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic project No. LM2015071 and by the grant of the University of West Bohemia, project No. SGS-2016-039.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucie Skorkovská .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skorkovská, L. (2016). Relevant Documents Selection for Blind Relevance Feedback in Speech Information Retrieval. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9924. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45510-5_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45510-5_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45509-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45510-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics