Skip to main content

Applying ER-MCDA and BF-TOPSIS to Decide on Effectiveness of Torrent Protection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Belief Functions: Theory and Applications (BELIEF 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9861))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Experts take into account several criteria to assess the effectiveness of torrential flood protection systems. In practice, scoring each criterion is imperfect. Each system is assessed choosing a qualitative class of effectiveness among several such classes (high, medium, low, no). Evidential Reasoning for Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis (ER-MCDA) approach can help formalize this Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem but only provides a coarse ranking of all systems. The recent Belief Function-based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (BF-TOPSIS) methods give a finer ranking but are limited to perfect scoring of criteria. Our objective is to provide a coarse and a finer ranking of systems according to their effectiveness given the imperfect scoring of criteria. Therefore we propose to couple the two methods using an intermediary decision and a quantification transformation step. Given an actual MCDM problem, we apply the ER-MCDA and its coupling with BF-TOPSIS, showing that the final fine ranking is consistent with a previous coarse ranking in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For any BBAs x, y, z defined on \(2^\varTheta \), a true distance metric d(xy) satisfies the properties of non-negativity (\(d(x,y) \ge 0\)), non-degeneracy (\(d(x,y) = 0 \Leftrightarrow x=y\)), symmetry (\(d(x,y)=d(y,x)\)), and triangle inequality (\(d(x,y)+d(y,z) \ge d(x,z)\)).

  2. 2.

    with the PCR6 rule in this paper [8] (Vol. 3).

References

  1. Carladous, S., Tacnet, J.-M., Dezert, J., Batton-Hubert, M.: Belief function theory based decision support methods: application to torrent protection work effectiveness and reliability assessment. In: 25th International Conference on ESREL, Zürich, Switzerland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tacnet, J.-M., Dezert, J., Batton-Hubert, M.: AHP and uncertainty theories for decision making using the ER-MCDA methodology. In: 11th International Symposium on AHP, Sorrento, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M.: Evidential reasoning for multi-criteria analysis based on DSmT-AHP. In: 11th International Symposium on AHP, Sorrento, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dezert, J., Han, D., Yin, H.: A new belief function based approach for multi-criteria decision-making support. In: 19th International Conference on Fusion, Heidelberg, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Smarandache, F., Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M.: Fusion of sources of evidence with different importances and reliabilities. In: 13th International Conference on Fusion, Edinburgh, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smarandache, F., Dezert, J.: Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion, vol. 1–4. ARP (2004–2015). http://www.onera.fr/fr/staff/jean-dezert

  9. Dezert, J., Tchamova, A.: On the validity of Dempster’s fusion rule and its interpretation as a generalization of Bayesian fusion rule. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29(3), 223–252 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artif. Intell. 66, 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb, B.R., Shenoy, P.P.: On the plausibility transformation method for translating belief function models to probability models. IJAR 41(3), 314–330 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dezert, J., Han, D., Tacnet, J.-M., Carladous, S.: Decision-making with belief interval distance. In: 4th International Conference on Belief Functions, Prague, Czech Republic (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Han, D., Dezert, J., Yang, Y.: New distance measures of evidence based on belief intervals. In: 3rd International Conference on Belief Functions, Oxford, UK (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Irpino, A., Verde, R.: Dynamic clustering of interval data using a Wasserstein-based distance. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29, 1648–1658 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y., Hwang, C.L.: TOPSIS for MODM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76(3), 486–500 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their thanks to the French Ministry of Agriculture, Forest (MAAF), and Environment (MEEM), the Grant for State Key Program for Basic Research of China (973) (No. 2013CB329405), the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 61573275), and the Science and technology project of Shaanxi Province (No. 2013KJXX-46) for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Carladous .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carladous, S., Tacnet, JM., Dezert, J., Han, D., Batton-Hubert, M. (2016). Applying ER-MCDA and BF-TOPSIS to Decide on Effectiveness of Torrent Protection. In: Vejnarová, J., Kratochvíl, V. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9861. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45558-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45559-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics