Skip to main content

Exploring Uncertainty and Movement in Categorical Perception Using Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIV (PPSN 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9921))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2933 Accesses

Abstract

Cognitive agents are able to perform categorical perception through physical interaction (active categorical perception; ACP), or passively at a distance (distal categorical perception; DCP). It is possible that the former scaffolds the learning of the latter. However, it is unclear whether ACP indeed scaffolds DCP in humans and animals, nor how a robot could be trained to likewise learn DCP from ACP. Here we demonstrate a method for doing so which involves uncertainty: robots are trained to perform ACP when uncertain and DCP when certain. We found evidence in these trials that suggests such scaffolding may be occurring: Early during training, robots moved objects to reduce uncertainty as to their class (ACP), but later in training, robots exhibited less action and less class uncertainty (DCP). Furthermore, we demonstrate that robots trained in such a manner are more competent at categorizing novel objects than robots trained to categorize in other ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beer, R.D.: The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adapt. Behav. 11(4), 209–243 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bongard, J.: The utility of evolving simulated robot morphology increases with task complexity for object manipulation. Artif. Life 16(3), 201–223 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R.A.: Elephants don’t play Chess. Robot. Auton. Syst. 6(1), 3–15 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauser, H., Ijspeert, A.J., Füchslin, R.M., Pfeifer, R., Maass, W.: Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biol. Cybern. 105(5–6), 355–370 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Lungarella, M., Sporns, O.: Information self-structuring: key principle for learning and development. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Development and Learning, pp. 25–30. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul, C.: Morphological computation: a basis for the analysis of morphology and control requirements. Robot. Auton. Syst. 54(8), 619–630 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeifer, R., Iida, F., Lungarella, M.: Cognition from the bottom up: on biological inspiration, body morphology, and soft materials. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18(8), 404–413 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt, M., Lipson, H.: Age-fitness pareto optimization. In: Riolo, R., McConaghy, T., Vladislavleva, E. (eds.) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VIII, vol. 8, pp. 129–146. Springer, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Seung, H.S., Opper, M., Sompolinsky, H.: Query by committee. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 287–294. ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tuci, E., Massera, G., Nolfi, S.: Active categorical perception of object shapes in a simulated anthropomorphic robotic arm. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 14(6), 885–899 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zieba, K., Bongard, J.: An embodied approach for evolving robust visual classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conerence, pp. 201–208. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under projects PECASE-0953837 and INSPIRE-1344227.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel Powell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Powell, N., Bongard, J. (2016). Exploring Uncertainty and Movement in Categorical Perception Using Robots. In: Handl, J., Hart, E., Lewis, P., López-Ibáñez, M., Ochoa, G., Paechter, B. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIV. PPSN 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9921. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45823-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics