Abstract
In navigation with virtual reality, spatial knowledge can be acquired through both route and survey perspective. Our study correlates the influence on spatial knowledge while navigating in a virtual reality environment after gaining information with different spatial perspectives. We measured brain activations while the participants navigated through a complex spatial environment, using the analysis tool of sLORETA. In the experimental condition, the participant watched a simulated video feed of either route perspective (front view) or survey perspective (top view) of the virtual environment. Distance travelled, path efficiency and time efficiency of the participants were measured while they navigated through nine successive landmarks. We obtained significant differences between the brain activation patterns while comparing both conditions. Higher activations in inferior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus and insula were observed for the theta band in route perspective when compared to survey perspective. Higher activations in the inferior parietal lobule, angular gyrus and precuneus were observed in survey perspective when compared to route perspective. Results showed higher path efficiency and time efficiency and lower distance travelled to reach the destination in survey perspective when compared to route perspective. The result indicates that survey perspective is better for navigation in a far spaced virtual reality environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 10, 9 (1975)
Tversky, B.: Spatial mental models. Psychol. Learn. Motiv.: Adv. Res. Theory 27, 109–145 (1991)
Thorndyke, P.W., Hayes-Roth, B.: Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn. Psychol. 14(4), 560–589 (1982)
Mellet, E., et al.: Neural correlates of topographic mental exploration: the impact of route versus survey perspective learning. Neuroimage 12(5), 588–600 (2000)
Slater, M., Usoh, M., Steed, A.: Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 3(2), 130–144 (1994)
Barfield, W., Weghorst, S.: The sense of presence within virtual environments: a conceptual framework. Adv. Hum. Factors Ergon. 19, 699 (1993)
Clemente, M., et al.: Assessment of the influence of navigation control and screen size on the sense of presence in virtual reality using EEG. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(4), 1584–1592 (2014)
White, D.J., et al.: Brain oscillatory activity during spatial navigation: theta and gamma activity link medial temporal and parietal regions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24(3), 686–697 (2012)
De Araújo, D.B., Baffa, O., Wakai, R.T.: Theta oscillations and human navigation: a magnetoencephalography study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14(1), 70–78 (2002)
Nguyen, H.M., et al.: sLORETA current source density analysis of evoked potentials for spatial updating in a virtual navigation task. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 66 (2014)
Brunyé, T.T., et al.: Going to town: visualized perspectives and navigation through virtual environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(1), 257–266 (2012)
Pascual-Marqui, R.D.: Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24(Suppl. D), 5–12 (2002)
Fuchs, M., et al.: A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113(5), 702–712 (2002)
Jurcak, V., Tsuzuki, D., Dan, I.: 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. Neuroimage 34(4), 1600–1611 (2007)
Maguire, E.A., Frackowiak, R.S., Frith, C.D.: Recalling routes around London: activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. J. Neurosci. 17(18), 7103–7110 (1997)
Epstein, R., Kanwisher, N.: A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392(6676), 598–601 (1998)
Aguirre, G.K., Zarahn, E., D’Esposito, M.: Neural components of topographical representation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 95(3), 839–846 (1998)
Maguire, E.A., et al.: Knowing where things are: parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space. Cogn. Neurosci. 10(1), 61–76 (1998)
Levitin, D.J., Menon, V.: Musical structure is processed in “language” areas of the brain: a possible role for Brodmann Area 47 in temporal coherence. Neuroimage 20(4), 2142–2152 (2003)
Karnath, H.O., Baier, B., Nägele, T.: Awareness of the functioning of one’s own limbs mediated by the insular cortex. J. Neurosci. 25(31), 7134–7138 (2005)
Radua, J., et al.: Neural response to specific components of fearful faces in healthy and schizophrenic adults. Neuroimage 49(1), 939–946 (2010)
Taylor, H.A., Tversky, B.: Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J. Mem. Lang. 31(2), 261–292 (1992)
Ferguson, E.L., Hegarty, M.: Properties of cognitive maps constructed from texts. Mem. Cogn. 22(4), 455–473 (1994)
Cavanna, A.E., Trimble, M.R.: The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129(3), 564–583 (2006)
Arzy, S., et al.: Induction of an illusory shadow person. Nature 443(7109), 287 (2006)
Shelton, A.L., Gabrieli, J.D.: Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives. J. Neurosci. 22(7), 2711–2717 (2002)
Brunyé, T.T., Taylor, H.A.: Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions. Acta Psychol. 127(2), 340–354 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sharma, G., Salam, A.A., Chandra, S., Singh, V., Mittal, A. (2016). Influence of Spatial Learning Perspectives on Navigation Through Virtual Reality Environment. In: Ascoli, G., Hawrylycz, M., Ali, H., Khazanchi, D., Shi, Y. (eds) Brain Informatics and Health. BIH 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9919. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47103-7_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47103-7_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47102-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47103-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)