Abstract
In this paper, we introduced a novel technique to generate more user-oriented detection rules by taking into account their feedback. Our techniques initially generate a set of detection rules that will be used to detect candidate code smells, these reported code smells will be exposed in an interactive fashion to the developer who will give his/her feedback by either approving or rejecting the identified code smell in the code fragment. This feedback will be fed to the GP as constraints and additional examples in order to converge towards more user-preferred detection rules. We initially investigated the detection of three types of code smells in four open source systems and reported that the interactive code smell detection achieves a precision of 89 % and recall on average when detecting infected classes. Results show that our approach can best imitate the user’s decision while omitting the complexity of manual tuning the detection rules.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mäntylä, M., Vanhanen, J., Lassenius, C.: A taxonomy and an initial empirical study of bad smells in code. In: Proceedings of Conference Name, Conference Location, pp. 381–384 (2003)
Marinescu, R.: Detection strategies: metrics-based rules for detecting design flaws. In: Proceedings of Conference Name, Conference Location, pp. 350–359 (2004)
Moha, N., Gueheneuc, Y.-G., Duchien, L., Le Meur, A.-F.: DECOR: a method for the specification and detection of code and design smells. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 36(1), 20–36 (2010)
Kessentini, M., Kessentini, W., Sahraoui, H., Boukadoum, M., Ouni, A.: Design defects detection and correction by example. In: Proceedings of Conference Name, Conference Location, pp. 81–90, 22–24 June 2011
Mäntylä, M.V., Lassenius, C.: Subjective evaluation of software evolvability using code smells: an empirical study. Empirical Softw. Eng. 11(3), 395–431 (2006)
Deb, K., Srinivasan, A.: Innovization: innovating design principles through optimization. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Seattle, Washington, USA (2006)
Marinescu, R., Ganea, G., Verebi, I.: inCode: continuous quality assessment and improvement. In: Proceedings of Conference Name, Conference Location, pp. 274–275 (2010)
Williamson, D.F., Parker, R.A., Kendrick, J.S.: The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data. Ann. Intern. Med. 110(11), 916–921 (1989)
Mkaouer, M.W., Kessentini, M., Bechikh, S., Deb, K., Ó Cinnéide, M.: Recommendation system for software refactoring using innovization and interactive dynamic optimization. In: Proceedings of Conference Name, Conference Location, pp. 331–336 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mkaouer, M.W. (2016). Interactive Code Smells Detection: An Initial Investigation. In: Sarro, F., Deb, K. (eds) Search Based Software Engineering. SSBSE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47106-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47106-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47105-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47106-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)